Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Douglas

Not correct. Andrew Johnson and Jimmy Carter come to mind. The definition of Presidential amnesty is pardon applied to a group of people not individually named.


40 posted on 11/16/2016 5:07:17 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto

Not correct. Andrew Johnson and Jimmy Carter come to mind. The definition of Presidential amnesty is pardon applied to a group of people not individually named.


I don’t think that is constitutional. What were they pardoned for?

To me, our whole government is about protecting the rights of the individual. So enforcement of a law can only apply to an individual. e.g. when you round up a bunch of rioters, they are not “collectively” charged. Rather, each individual is separately charged with their own mug shot, fingerprints, etc.

If you can’t charge a group of un-named people, how can you pardon a group, without basically just invalidating the law they all broke, which would apply to all citizens. And a president does not have that authority.

Just asking. Your post confuses my understanding of how the law works.


42 posted on 11/16/2016 5:14:27 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson