I don’t think you are providing original sources for the cast majority of your comments on FR, Thank You Rush, are you?
Liz has the sources and she knows her stuff. She is trying to get information she has collected into the discussion as quickly as possible.
She could provide specific sources, as needed, but I won’t hold you or her to always MLA citing references. Sounds good?
“”Liz has the sources and she knows her stuff””
Why? Because she posts a lot and no one questions her? Why do you feel the need to defend her posts? Where are her sources? Do you check out any of the “facts” she posts or just accept them without question?
Her reply to me about sources in my post was “HUH?” Why do you think that was her only reply?
It doesn’t take a genius to search for U.S. foreign aid and I defy anyone to find any record where Israel is not at the top of the list and has been for years and it stuck out like a sore thumb. I didn’t put a source on that post about foreign aid as it certainly wasn’t needed for MOST informed people. Have fun looking for anything I have posted as fact without a source.
If you are going to accept what someone writes without checking for accuracy, it seldom works out. In fact, it usually is proven to be quite troublesome.
Yesterday a freeper posted about the protesters against Trump being paid and that it was AGAINST THE LAW to organize protesters. That thread got about 40 replies and only two or three of us bothered to read the code that was cited and it had nothing to do with organizing protesters but like good lemmings, everyone piled on.
Why is it bothersome to actually get posts accurate? We can have a free exchange of ideas/opinions here on FR but let’s be sure we know what we’re talking about! That’s the way some of us operate in our private lives and the reason most freepers turn up their noses at the MSM...
“”Why do you think that was her only reply?””
Whoops - I spoke too soon. THAT wasn’t her only reply - the insult came next!! A tactic of a group we’re all too familiar with..