Posted on 11/14/2016 9:44:23 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
I triple dog dare you
He’ll look pretty foolish when Trump rescinds that EC on January 21st, 2017
“So, because this section of the Act doesnt specifically say it is reversible, Trump would need to go to court to try to reverse it. “
Wouldn’t he reverse it and then they would have to go to court to stop it?
Its gonna be seen as political - another midnight regulation.
It won’t tie Trump’s hands.
It is stupefying to me how all the libtards believe that any of Barky’s ECs have any legal weight.
I’m sure doing the bidding of rich Democrat environmental wackos is WAY up there on Trump’s list of things to do.
These idiots just need to go away.
This low-life Steyer ran a particular ad here in California that used Trump’s words out of context when Trump referred to certain illegals as murderers, drug dealers, rapists, etc.
You thought Al Gore was a shyster on the environment? This guy’s worse.
“Hey Steyer, ESAD!”
. . .n 2004, Steyer was criticized by UnFarallon, a group of student activists at Yale who discovered that much of Yale's endowment was in Steyer’s fund. The protest soon spread to Stanford, which also had millions invested with Farallon. The protest centered on Steyer’s supposed investing in companies with anti-labor and anti-environmental policies.[9]
A July 2014 article in the New York Times, headlined Aims of Donor Are Shadowed by Past in Coal, detailed several examples of Farallon investing in coal. In addition, it was learned that even after their divestment, Farallon-funded coal projects in places like Indonesia and China would continue. Environmentalists were disappointed by the revelations and GOP leaders called it a blow to Steyer’s credibility.[51]
In October 2016, Politico reported that under Steyers leadership, Farallon Capital had invested tens of millions of dollars in private prisons.[76] According to SEC filings, Steyer was at the helm as the hedge fund purchased nearly $90 million of Corrections Corporation of America stock, equaling approximately more than 5% of the companys shares.[77]
University of San Francisco law professor Constance de la Vega criticized the Farallon investments as appearing antithetical to Steyers avowed progressive politics.[78]
This nutcase is absolutely OBSESSED with getting rid of oil!!! But what will he replace oil WITH??? Not so sure../s;)
Billionaire Tom Steyer couldn’t care less about a rise in oil prices due to supply shortages.
Styler ran hundreds of millions of dollars worth of ads, constantly attacking Trump, pushing billions in new taxes, and more overreach of state government.
Wonder how he feels about blowing that cash now?
Those ads were non-stop.
He is complete nut.
Ayup.
Then while that was going on, he'd issue drilling rights to a dozen companies and use the oil as part of the national military reserve and protect the drilling under the National Defense Act.
Electricity from nuclear reactors, parceled out to Friends of the Reich, constantly evaluated from implanted computer chips connected to the cloud.
In Silicon Valley? Yeah, it's like that.
-PJ
Steyres can suck on my drill column.
Libs never seem to get past the 1st level of how people will react to their edicts.
Perhaps it’s time to tax the billionaires and their foundations into poverty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.