The verdict is a shocker...
http://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/217570238-video
There’s 5 parts in all, but the above is the conclusion.
http://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-news/217491292-story
According to the DNA analysis of the blood found in John Carpenter’s rental car, it isn’t that of Bob Crane. They fully expected it would match but apparently doesn’t. The local prosecutors, despite learning of this, still believe Carpenter is the guilty party.
But they said the second sample was too contaminated. Do you think it was the wife or female they mentioned?
“It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.”
Using 38 year old samples isn’t going to convict too many people. So, technically, yes, I’d have to quote Arlen Specter and say “Not proven”.
But, I still know Carpenter did it. The camera tripod was all metal construction and it’s doubtful the average sized woman of 38 years ago was going to wield it around like a ninja. Sorry, Mr. Defense Attorney, your “theory” is rubbish.
Also, if you’ve seen the movie “Autofocus”, Crane >DID NOT< “score” the night he was killed; he discussed it with Carpenter, when Carpenter called him asking him if he was alone. When Crane said he wasn’t, it was a green light for Carpenter to kill him.
Carpenter got away with murder, period.
Great find FM!