Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Rationally, yes. Rats are anything but rational. Once he narrows the list to one they will descend on that one and destroy them. The question becomes, can enough Rat Senators be peeled of the pack to get the nominee confirmed in spite of the blizzard of lies the NY Slimes, et. al. will produce?


12 posted on 11/14/2016 1:47:39 PM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute
Rationally, yes. Rats are anything but rational. Once he narrows the list to one they will descend on that one and destroy them. The question becomes, can enough Rat Senators be peeled of the pack to get the nominee confirmed in spite of the blizzard of lies the NY Slimes, et. al. will produce?
Rationally, the Dems need 40 to sustain a filibuster, and they only have 48 senators, total. Twenty five (25) of them - an outright majority - are up for reelection in ’18, and ten of those are from states Trump won (including one from WVa, which Trump won by about a two-to-one margin). That is the kind of rationality that Democrats understand.

And if the Republicans are able to make vote fraud harder to get away with and more painful to get caught at, that would help even more.


14 posted on 11/14/2016 3:00:44 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson