[tired&retired]

Possibly gravity is a function of lower dense consciousness.

We exist within a higher consciousness that some call God. There are different attributes for each level of consciousness, gravity being associated with the lower more dense consciousness.

The reason scientists speculate that dark matter exists is that they do not perceive much of the matter in existence. If they merely tuned their own consciousness to a higher level they would automatically perceive what already exists. Frequency of consciousness is the variable scientists miss and therefor assume it to be a constant.

For example, time is not a function of the speed of light. Time is a function of the frequency of consciousness divided by the speed of light. This is why time collapses at the higher levels, as experienced by the mystics.

An individual’s reality is a function of the level of consciousness from which they view it.

[Hostage]

One cannot measure 'consciousness'. If otherwise, it would be possible to make robots have 'understanding' and therefore imbue them with a 'soul', thereby completing and enabling human fleshly matter to enter the godhead which is impossible because of Satan's death sentence to the flesh.

Alternatively and hypothetically, a computer given a 'soul' would replicate its information from one memory device to a surviving one (because matter is temporal and decays) but it would need to transfer its 'understanding' (i.e. its 'soul') which is incomplete. However, information is infinite (or assume otherwise and follow the logical analysis to its unavoidable contradiction) and therefore the transference of consciousness is never complete. Case closed.

Ergo, God exists, God is light.

Reducing consciousness to computation renders it either finite and confined inside the realm of computers (impossible; left as an exercise) or countable in which case it is always incomplete and therefore never transferable. Can consciousness be divided and exist without parts of itself? Of course not. But can it be assembled?

Unless ALL parts of consciousness are salvageable, regenerate (reborn), or otherwise collectible by a 'Messiah' particle that by force of 'creation' (= Alpha and Omega, God is both infinite and a singularity, never confined to the measurable in mass, time or space; never reduced, irreducible) overcomes the jealous 'Satan' particle which seeks to destroy any part of consciousness, no matter how small, then consciousness cannot exist, ergo God is dead, therefore we are dead. Who wins this game? The Creator or the Destroyer? It must be the Creator because of infinity, e.g. George Cantor's Dust. Infinity can't even be consumed by infinity.

The long and short of it is that we are able to 'reduce' a great many things to mathematics, sometimes even catching a glimmer of 'truth' (THE Truth) but our complete understanding is never attainable unless we are one with God, and God is not a fudge factor. How can a fudge factor be infinite? Replace, refine a fudge factor and there will still be a need for a new fudge factor ad infinitum, ad insanitarium (see Cantor sets, Cantor Dust).

So where does all this leave us? It leaves us in need of new forms of entertainment, needing new shiny objects. Verlinde's new game is definitely more intriguing than a NY Times Sunday crossword puzzle. It may even lead to improving our lives by a thousand-fold. Ok great! Now we get to live to 10,000 years of age and travel a good part of the galaxy. Then what? There will always be a Hillary Clinton lurking around the bend, or something worse.

We do it because we care for each other and our children, no other reason except that we are curious apes with a flint of consciousness. God is Love.

Where's our roadmap God? Where's our starmap? C'mon Buddy, we're tired of waiting! We want to hang out with you!

If my angle is impalpable, then watch physicist Sir Roger Penrose try to explain it and pay attention to his mention of the greatest philosopher of the 20th Century and Einstein's best friend and mentor, Kurt Gödel

Kurt Gödel

Sir Roger here:
Sir Roger Penrose On Consciousness