Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell

I don’t know; I think Trump is laying some careful brick work, yet another wall. He’s clear what kind of jurists he’s going to nominate, and pretty clear that at this time he doesn’t want to touch this.

But should liberals go more insane, that will bring this topic before they court. They want to jump the wall to push the gays off with cases against bakers or churches and make the court reevaluate the decision, they won’t like the result.

Thing is, liberals are great doubling down on stupid. That such walls are built to be pushed over, that to somehow ‘protect’ gays, it is perfectly acceptable to sacrifice them for more votes.

Only one huge problem. Donald J Trump will have no problem articulating that in a speech


30 posted on 11/13/2016 6:20:35 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

There are already two states whose Civil Rights Commissions are trying to argue states are public accommodations if they do anything other than have service.
So if you host potlucks or Scouts or American Heritage Girls, Massachusetts and Iowa are trying to say you have to follow federal transgender guidelines.
So you have to let boys into the girls’ troop and stay on their spend the nights, you have to let men with delusions into the women’s shelter, and you can’t complain if a man in the dress uses the women’s bathroom.
In both cases, the Civil Rights Commissions were even saying that the churches could be sued if there was an atmosphere of intimidation - if the church didn’t censor its members, it could be sued.


59 posted on 11/13/2016 6:53:34 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson