Replies

First of all, I suggest you ponder what might be the motives behind the anti-vax propagandists. Keep in mind that the left loves death, always wants more people to die, and believes that the world is grossly overpopulated. And then ask yourself why these death-lovers want you to not vaccinate your children.

The death rates from “vaccine-preventable” diseases was down about 90-95% on average before vaccination even started.

The fact that modern medicine can save the lives of people who would have died without medical treatment does not mean that getting those deadly diseases is preferable to preventing them in the first place. Why subject a child to a miserable illness and potential life-long disability or death just because some fear-monger (who wants more kids to die) said a bunch of scary stuff about vaccines?

The Poling family would differ, as would the federal vaccine Court, as do the vaccine product inserts themselves.

Hannah Poling's condition was a result of a rare genetic defect that she has that would have caused her to suffer brain damage from *any* febrile illness. She has a mitochondrial abnormality that leaves her extremely susceptible to oxidative damage from any condition that causes energy needs to increase, like a fever. Around one in ten thousand children do develop a fever following the measles vaccine. In her case, unfortunately, the mitochondria were not able to keep up with the increased metabolic needs caused by the immune system's response to the vaccine, and oxidative brain damage resulted. Children with her condition usually show evidence of brain damage between ages 2 and 3. They are recommended to be especially vigilant about taking vaccines, because they are so susceptible to injuries resulting from infectious disease. Blaming the measles vaccine for her brain damage is like blaming the color of a car for the broken bones you suffered when the car hit you.

That scumbag Paul Offit, who is on your side, once said that it was safe to administer 10,000 vaccines to an infant in one doctor visit. Do you agree with him? What is the safe dose of aluminum for a 7LB baby? And mercury? And aborted fetal tissue?

A man who has saved millions of lives and permanent disabilities is a scumbag? Tell me, do you also celebrate the work of abortionists? Of course it would be safe to administer 10,000 vaccines in a single doctor visit--if it weren't for the fact that most of them are delivered through needles, and that many needle pricks in one visit would probably cause quite a bit of damage. The vaccines themselves would not. As I have already pointed out, even if your child received every recommended vaccine during a single doctor visit, the number of antigenic proteins contained in all of those vaccines combined is insignificant next to the number of antigens your kid ingests every time he shoves his dirty little fist into his mouth.

Do you ever wrap food in aluminum foil? If so, then you get a higher dose of aluminum from that food than is contained in any vaccine. If you eat a tuna sandwich, you get far more mercury than is contained in any thiomersal preserved vaccine. You get larger doses of aluminum and mercury in your food every day--why worry about a tiny dose of aluminum or mercury in a vaccine that you might receive three times in a lifetime?

Oh, and there is no fetal tissue in any vaccines.

Looking forward to the day when Dr Wakefield gets his MD license reinstated.

That is extremely unlikely. In the course of his fake research, he mistreated human subjects in a way that is as egregious as the infamous Tuskegee experiments. No review board would have ever condoned his "study" if he had gone through the proper channels to have his study approved. He mistreated children, lied about what he did, and he was motivated by greed. His license was very correctly pulled, since he should not be allowed near patients ever again.

I have researched the vaccine injury issue, testified on it in open Court, under oath and under x-examination in a family Court matter (and prevailed to a degree unheard of in the environment, I have been told), read numerous books on vaccines both pro- and con-, and spoken to the experts. Some vaccines are OK, but the number, frequency and age at which they are delivered is a problem. The ingredients are a massive problem, as numerous research conferences (simpsonwood etc) have pointed out, if one reads carefully. Multiple adjuvants have a multiplicative insult effect on children, even if some do not immediately show signs of vaccine injury.

We are the most heavily vaccinated country in the world, and yet we have some of the most unhealthy children in the developed world. Travel internationally and see.

You say that the Poling case was a tiny incidence. You are wrong. The experts who work with vaccine injured children tell me that it could be as high as 35%, and that is just for that one genetic predisposition. At minimum, why not run the MTHFR and urine organic acid tests on every child prior to vaccination? At minimum, why not take dietary precautions before and after vaccination to help protect the child? These are reasonable steps, but to someone who is all-in with the sacred cow of vaccination, this is blasphemy. Oh wait, it isn’t the “standard of care”, the same vile excuse used to not recommend that every child be tested for blood levels of vitamin D.

The idiots in the medical establishment claim that diagnosis is the reason autism rates have skyrocketed. Okay, so where are all the hundreds of thousands of previously undiagnosed autistic adults, folks who cannot speak and who bang their heads on walls (etc)??