Posted on 11/09/2016 2:58:26 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Ann Coulter appearing on Good Morning Britain: (Video Only)
Comments worth repeating, especially the final three comments :
Annie had it pegged from the get go. Has anyone else been so vilified by the left over the past 5 years? Brave smart woman, with rapier wit. 2nd only to Trump in being disrespected and vilified. I hope shes correct about the defeat of Globalism, but I really dont expect that to happen without way more fight than it took to get Trump elected.
Coulter and the rest of the media would start calling the globalist what they really are progressive, socialist, communists. The vote count for DJT would have been higher if the uninformed Democrats actually knew this fact about their Party.
This will be looked back upon as one of the watershed predictions in American politics. The regressive, anti-American globalist left will never be able to live it down.
>>>This is not the end of the war. This is only one battle. They will regroup.
>>> I believe it is their ability to create money out of thin air that allows them unlimited funds to wage this war. That is what we must end.
>>>This isnt THE defeat OF Globalism. It is A defeat FOR Globalism. They are far from defeated. They will continue their insidious attack and pernicious boring into the bulwark that protects our freedom. Remain vigilant. Steady as she goes
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
The war starts when Trump takes office.
He will be facing a bi-partisan Congress, GOP-E and Democrat, united against him.
And Obama will get some sucker punches in between now and January.
Geez, I don’t envy Trump. But I am glad he won.
Ann’s right.
Not only is she gorgeous, she’s smart as a whip, too.
We reaffirm our belief in the protective tariff to extend needed protection to our productive industries. We believe in protection as a national policy, with due and equal regard to all sections and to all classes. It is only by adherence to such a policy that the well being of the consumers can be safeguarded that there can be assured to American agriculture, to American labor and to American manufacturers a return to perpetrate American standards of life. A protective tariff is designed to support the high American economic level of life for the average family and to prevent a lowering to the levels of economic life prevailing in other lands.
In the history of the nation the protective tariff system has ever justified itself by restoring confidence, promoting industrial activity and employment, enormously increasing our purchasing power and bringing increased prosperity to all our people.
The tariff protection to our industry works for increased consumption of domestic agricultural products by an employed population instead of one unable to purchase the necessities of life. Without the strict maintenance of the tariff principle our farmers will need always to compete with cheap lands and cheap labor abroad and with lower standards of living.
The enormous value of the protective principle has once more been demonstrated by the emergency tariff act of 1921 and the tariff act of 1922.
We assert our belief in the elastic provision adopted by congress in the tariff act of 1922 providing for a method of readjusting the tariff rates and the classifications in order to meet changing economic conditions when such changed conditions are brought to the attention of the president by complaint or application.
We believe that the power to increase or decrease any rate of duty provided in the tariff furnishes a safeguard on the one hand against excessive taxes and on the other hand against too high customs charges.
The wise provisions of this section of the tariff act afford ample opportunity for tariff duties to be adjusted after a hearing in order that they may cover the actual differences in the cost of production in the United States and the principal competing countries of the world.
We also believe that the application of this provision of the tariff act will contribute to business stability by making unnecessary general disturbances which are usually incident to general tariff revisions.
I love Ann and she’s right here, too.
I just can’t understand how she can love Trump (which she does) if she also loved Romney (which she did).
The only thing those two men really have in common is that they’re rich and white —that’s it.
But otherwise, they’re polar opposites.
I don’t understand either, but I’ll take it.
She knew Romney had the machine to win and that the system preferred him over the others.
I love Ann but thank God her BFF Romney lost 2012. He was pretty much white obama
Herbert Hoover
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.