Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
The New York Times has called Pennsylvania for Trump, but since they haven't called Wisconsin for him, they have only 264 electoral votes for him.

Hmm. The NYT currently has Trump up in WI by 3.2% with only 4% of the vote left to be counted, but they haven't called the state for him.

8,919 posted on 11/08/2016 10:53:12 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8791 | View Replies ]


To: TChad

It’s a >95% chance Trump wins Wisconsin, and Michigan is not far behind.

I, Cato in PA, am calling this election for Donald Trump.


8,947 posted on 11/08/2016 10:54:14 PM PST by Cato in PA (Poll Watcher - Cuyahoga County, OH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8919 | View Replies ]

To: TChad

The networks are now being huge babies and are refusing to call him the winner out of spite.


8,950 posted on 11/08/2016 10:54:23 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8919 | View Replies ]

To: TChad

If they were to call it, the fraudsters might stop making and counting the thousands of ballots for Clinton, and they would go home. Therefore, keep it going and don’t let the media dogs go off-leash.


9,007 posted on 11/08/2016 10:57:46 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8919 | View Replies ]

To: TChad

Cankles will not accept the results of the election. oh, the outrage.

POS Podesta refusing to concede.


9,125 posted on 11/08/2016 11:03:12 PM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8919 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson