Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/07/2016 5:22:01 AM PST by AJFavish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: AJFavish

I wish that Comey had used the word “...yet.”


2 posted on 11/07/2016 5:24:55 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Corrupt Comey,

A corrupted FBI for all the world to see,

Is there anything the lawless Clintons have ever come in contact with that was not corrupted?


4 posted on 11/07/2016 5:26:33 AM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Comey: “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton.”

IOW - she’s still dishonest and we still believe that the country’s classified information was stolen from her sevrer


5 posted on 11/07/2016 5:27:50 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Cucks are still holding out home that Comey is not corrupt


6 posted on 11/07/2016 5:31:03 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

The other important thing to consider is that she would never, ever be indicted and tried in court and marched into jail as a common criminal like even ones like Martha Stewart and Conrad Black were. Obama would have at any time between now and January would have issued a full pardon regardless of the election result.


8 posted on 11/07/2016 5:32:24 AM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Doubtless Comey has been very busy lately, scrubbing email material which would put his mistress in a bad light ... the man is infecting the FBI. One is left wondering if there are any members of honest character left in the FBI?


9 posted on 11/07/2016 5:33:36 AM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for spiritual discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Spellcheck for name = JAMES COMEDY


10 posted on 11/07/2016 5:34:52 AM PST by litehaus (A memory toooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

They reviewed only the emails to or from Hillary. But they don’t say that they reviewed all of the emails that went thru Hillary’s server. The crime is just that classified emails from Hillary’s server ended up on Weiner’s computer. Other than the fact that it was classified, the content is irrelevant.


12 posted on 11/07/2016 5:35:40 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

But he got the headlines that they wanted this morning.

USA Today headline in huge letters...

“FBI CLEARS CLINTON IN EMAILS - AGAIN”


13 posted on 11/07/2016 5:36:58 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

I would like to know if the stories of hundreds of honest FBI agents threatening to resign and go public were true, or if these were also part of the ridiculous Kabuki theater we’ve all just witnessed.

Guys, if you were ever going to go public with what you know today might be a good day.


14 posted on 11/07/2016 5:40:46 AM PST by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

The FBI Director cannot exonerate or indicts. His duties is to make recommendations. The DOJ, may uphold that recommendations or may discard them. Unfortunately , the DOJ uphold them.


16 posted on 11/07/2016 5:42:33 AM PST by cambyses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Every time one of these corrupt officials makes a statement the same people come out of the woodwork with their insane theories about how “what they didn’t say” or their body language tells the tale. They are so smart they are playing 3d chess, just wait you’ll see. Occam’s razor say they are wrong, the simplest answer is usually the right one. Lucy meet football.


18 posted on 11/07/2016 5:50:21 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

If the DNC wants to destroy Comey - - or ‘help control’ him the MSM and Washington Post will do their dirty work..

Elite thugs running the MSM are on the take - they’re owned by the DNC. Bribes don’t come in the form of cash for ‘journalists’ - - they come in the form of ‘help on the job’....

http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/06/wikileaks-show-washington-post-writer-asked-dnc-for-anti-trump-research/

“Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank appears to have asked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to do the majority of the research for a negative column he wrote about Donald Trump in April 2016.”


19 posted on 11/07/2016 5:53:06 AM PST by GOPJ (Hillary's next book: "How to Make $100 Million as a Public Servant" - - freeperJs aoshua c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Does anyone really think Barack HUSSEIN Obama, made a mistake when he appointed James Comey? Every branch of the government has been compromised by progressives, there has been no stone unturned.


20 posted on 11/07/2016 5:54:11 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

The war on the FBI has started. The DNC will shift their thugs to attack the FBI rather than Trump.

And they’ll have help... the corrupt sh*ts in the MSM...

When the DNC wants to destroy Comey - - or ‘help control’ him the MSM and Washington Post will do their dirty work... CNN will ‘get the questions’ ...to grill and take them down too.

Elite thugs running the MSM are on the take - they’re owned by the DNC. Bribes don’t come in the form of cash for ‘journalists’ - - they come in the form of ‘help on the job’....

http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/06/wikileaks-show-washington-post-writer-asked-dnc-for-anti-trump-research/

“Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank appears to have asked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to do the majority of the research for a negative column he wrote about Donald Trump in April 2016.”


21 posted on 11/07/2016 5:56:16 AM PST by GOPJ (Hillary's next book: "How to Make $100 Million as a Public Servant" - - freeperJs aoshua c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Those emails that remain to be reviewed, will be ignored. Hillary walks.


22 posted on 11/07/2016 5:59:11 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (GO TRUMP! Drain the swamp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

What he really said,

“made you look away from the Clinton Foundation and I got by missing dog back.”


26 posted on 11/07/2016 6:36:34 AM PST by hadaclueonce (This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

Comey is the same as John Roberts. They’ve made the most mind-boggling decisions that have greatly helped push the progressive agenda. Roberts with the ACA and now Comey with this “no charges” BS. Idiots.


28 posted on 11/07/2016 6:40:20 AM PST by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

My take on this is a bit different, but reaches similar conclusions.

Comey’s October 28, 2016 letter to Congressional investigators was worded to fulfill Comey’s promise to update them on any change in status of the Hillary private server investigation. He provided few if any details, and said nothing about other matters.

Comey’s November 6, 2016 letter stayed in the exact tracks cut by his first letter. As such, it is deliberately narrow in scope, and deals only with Hillary Clinton and the use of the private server while she was SoS.

After the October 28 letter, the DoJ was exposed for stonewalling review of contents of the Weiner-Abedin laptop, by not procuring a new warrant, to allow searching it for information outside Weiner’s sexting activity. To manage the negative publicity, DoJ hopped to, and produced a warrant by Sunday — BUT, this warrant was crafted to allow examining only emails to or from Hillary while she was SoS (Comey echoes this in his Nov 6 letter). Clinton operative/Assistant Attorney General Peter J. Kadzik was put in charge by Clinton and Lynch, and rigged the process to forestall analyzing the data for any other Clinton crimes.

In July, Comey stated that he would not recommend indictment because no reasonable prosecutor would choose to proceed with the case. That is a far cry from saying Hillary was innocent, and our Congressional Solons lacked the wit to ask Comey: Do you believe that HRC violated the law? (Not whether a prosecutor would risk his or her career, family, and life to bring a case against her, knowing a Washington, D.C. jury would acquit regardless of evidence.)

Claims that Comey’s statements and letters “exonerate” or “clear” Hillary Clinton and her cronies, are as false as the perfect white teeth she sometimes wears. The DoJ designed and timed this whirlwind “review” to produce a statement the press could deliberately misinterpret before the election.


29 posted on 11/07/2016 6:41:28 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJFavish

CORRUPT Comey, CORRUPT LYNCH, CORRUPT OBAMA and Hilliary will go down as thw BIGGEST SCANDAL in AMERICAN HISTORY!!


34 posted on 11/07/2016 8:56:32 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson