To: Netz
still, it is very curious for the Clintonistas to suggest that any wikileaks in the next day are probably "fakes"....and I think they did use the word "wild" wikileaks....
now why would they go to such lengths to prepare us if they didn't know something pretty bad is coming....
56 posted on
11/06/2016 11:33:42 PM PST by
cherry
To: cherry
...many questions, lots of hope (for final, damning evidence) threats and counter threats as the clock ticks away.
72 posted on
11/07/2016 12:23:05 AM PST by
Netz
( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
To: cherry
...many questions, lots of hope (for final, damning evidence) threats and counter threats as the clock ticks away.
73 posted on
11/07/2016 12:23:05 AM PST by
Netz
( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
To: cherry
[[it is very curious for the Clintonistas to suggest that any wikileaks in the next day are probably “fakes”....]]
I don’t care if they’re fakes. If they serve the purpose of taking down Hillary’s campaign they’re OK by me. Did Samuel Adams, et al., follow the rules to save the citizens? No.
89 posted on
11/07/2016 3:31:17 AM PST by
MayflowerMadam
(Rev. Jeffress re Trump: "He may not be like us, but he likes us.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson