WOW WEE! Oddly enough, regardless of the outcome, the paris BS agreement will have little impact on me. So, the get rich over a long time frame (frog, boiling water) is mostly a plan for countries to begin thinking about putting together some sort of plan to mitigate a non-existent "problem" demanding YUGE amounts of money to maybe solve, so they can move on to further discussions to talk about the plans they have come up with which will require modification and rewrites for decades to come. Okay, makes sense to me, said no one ever.
1 posted on
11/06/2016 7:07:26 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
No ratification by the Senate, no agreement.
**** the UN!
2 posted on
11/06/2016 7:09:56 AM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: rktman
Trump will not use "we gotta save the planet" as a way to further enslave the People by using lies to alarm folks while robbing them blind and throwing money to those who want to destroy us. The U.N. will see a much different set of folks representing American interests once he is in the WH....
4 posted on
11/06/2016 7:13:07 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: rktman
Stroke of the pen, law of the land.
With that, Trump can undo everything Obama put into place.
And the Paris Accord was never ratified by the Senate.
Obama is dreaming.
5 posted on
11/06/2016 7:17:21 AM PST by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: rktman
They are delusional. If Trump wins this fleecing of America in the name of “climate change” by the UN is over,
9 posted on
11/06/2016 7:30:33 AM PST by
fireman15
(The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
To: rktman
Is this the Paris agreement from last year that says
* countries will decide on and publish their own carbon goals
* countries will report on if they are meeting their goals
* there is no penalty for having a goal like “we will increase our carbon use by 100x in 10 year” or having a goal like “we will get to 0 carbon in 20 years” then tripling carbon and reporting that they are not meeting the goal.
Basically the agreement was to look like something is being accomplished not to actually do anything. And most countries will do nothing. Congress will keep Hillary from destroying the economy regardless of what goals she publishes. She’ll just have to report that no progress has been made toward her goals. Trump will just give a goal to do little/nothing and report we are meeting it (or he’ll ignore an un-ratified agreement).
So it’s true that the election will have little impact.
To: rktman
Trump should stand at the Rose Garden and burn a copy of the treaty.
(Lefties used to burn draft cards in the 1960s—now it is _our_ turn.)
11 posted on
11/06/2016 7:37:12 AM PST by
cgbg
(Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
To: rktman
...deputy special envoy for climate change Jonathan Pershing ....
Jon, Trump wins, your job and your department will no longer exist
13 posted on
11/06/2016 8:06:57 AM PST by
stylin19a
(obama = Fredo smart)
To: rktman
The Kyoto Protocol died when voters threw out the crazy governments
To: rktman
“Theres an article 28 in the agreement that provides for procedures for countries that would seek to withdraw, deputy special envoy for climate change Jonathan Pershing said in a teleconference call. But at the moment, I dont think thats very likely.
I wonder of those procedures include provisions for being told to “go to hell, we’re cutting you off”?
15 posted on
11/06/2016 10:11:46 AM PST by
Rebelbase
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson