Marc Faber: A Trump Victory Would Be Much Better For U.S. Assets (Video)

Wall Street Week ^ | Nov. 04, 2016 | Anthony Scaramucci and Gary Kaminsky

[Son House]

Gloom, Boom and Doom Report Editor Marc Faber and WL Ross & Co. Founder Wilbur Ross discuss the election's impact on the markets and economy.

[Son House]

Discussion is how Hillary is predictably very negative for stocks and bonds with more volatility. Hillary's policy to get full long-term capitol gains treatment will result more short term trading because people won't want to hold stock for 6 years. And they mention Hillary's $275 billion (more) tax on business to pay for a 'strange' infrastructure program.

They state the obvious Trump is much better for long-run. No wonder why Hillary's (and rigged media) strategy is to avoid issues like economics.

Hillary is just using poll tested scripts like 'middle-out' and that indicates any growth will be government controlled 'investments'.

[Rusty0604]

Thanks for posting. Marc Faber is one of my favorite investment guys.

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[headstamp 2]

“Thanks for posting. Marc Faber is one of my favorite investment guys.”

Yes, he founded Faber College along with his brother Emil.

[Jack Hammer]

Of course it would.

Trump is a successful businessman with an intimate knowledge of how money works.

The other candidate is nothing more nor less than a would-be dictator with an intimate knowledge of nothing except how Marxism works.

[Dr.Deth]

A Trump Victory Would Be Much Better For U.S. Assets

They won't be radioactive, for one thing.

Hillary seems to think the US can win a first strike against Russia, and will try IMO.