[Burkean]

And if you listen to the audio, Assange says “would not.” There is a huge difference—use of the conditional expresses more than one possible outcome, depending on the conditions. My sense was that Assange feels Wikileaks alters those conditions.

[WildHighlander57]

OK, is it “will not”, (title) “may not” (detective)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=1#1

Or “won’t be” (kabar)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=55#55

Or “would not” (Florida native)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=72#72

Looks like it’s “would not” (detective)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=78#78

IN CONTEXT of “ESTABLISHMENT” opposing him (Trump).

So, burkean, your read of it, “would not” is accurate, given the establishment forces in opposition.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=73#73

All y’all, thanks for the posts, I am severely hearing impaired, so I appreciate the info.

M.A.G.A. !!

Vote TRUMP!!