Explain how I "deliberately misrepresented" the Supreme Court cases that cite “natural born Citizen” as one born on U.S. soil to citizen parents.
A natural born citizen is one whose citizenship is beyond dispute, not synthetic, not subject to conflicting claims, not granted by statute or by any act of a sovereign, but inheres naturally in the person according to principles that don’t depend on laws or decisions of a sovereign.
Anyone that doesn't have a clear understanding of the meaning of the term: natural born Citizen after 8 years of an illegal usurper in the white house, should read the following HERE.
Not one word of what you just said is true, and I already proved your comment re: Minor V. Happersett was blatantly false. The Court specifically said they were making no such judgment in the ruling, yet you sit here, even after the direct quote was given with a direct link to the ruling itself for verification, say just the opposite. Obviously what you are saying is false, and you have to know it because it is staring you right in the face - along with the other court rulings proving your comments to be completely false. There is no way around this. Ignoring the facts and just posting your false statements all over again that were proven to be false doesn’t make them anymore true than when you started. You should be embarrassed. Knock it off.