Posted on 10/30/2016 9:04:06 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
Was immunity, or promises not to prosecute? If the latter, plenty are still lying through their teeth about it.
:: I wonder just how many “professional politicians” in DC are really sweating about this latest e-mail discovery??? ::
Speculative concept:
If the congress-critters thought about it... If, and because of this, several resigned after the inauguration (reduction of 535 to say 335?), that would put a huge stumbling block in President Trump’s way.
Their resignation would likely release them from culpability and then it’s on to more elections in the States.
That is NOT a very flattering photo of Gary Peters.
Mills and Samuelson are part of the Clinton Crime family. Common criminal behavior, JD or not, should be treated by the same common criminal punishment.
Okay, this goes to both sides here. I know that I sure as hell wouldn't want the FBI reading emails sent to my attorney with a retainer and assumed confidentiality of them either. Those devices were turned over in agreement with the authorities and a warrant to search for classified emails from the Clinton servers. Their lawyers agreed to this, they knew it was a waste of the FBI's time so they just said have at it. The FBI then said "Well, since se have their attorneys computers lets search them for a totally separate criminal investigation as well." Nope, on this the AG made the right call, not without a separate warrant with probable cause to do it. I want to see the Clintons brought down just as much as anyone, but that is a shortcut that isn't right. Get a judge to sign off on it, get a warrant, and then hell yes hand them over, but not unless there is probable cause to do it.
“C’mon all you young, liberal reporters! There is a Pulitzer prize with your name on it - if you will just follow the breadcrumb trail of corruption and report on the story of a life-time...”
It SHOULD BE the story of a lifetime, as should Benghazi, but unfortunately, there is no Pulitzer waiting for the journalist who breaks it.
One of the most sickening aspects of the left’s successful program of public brainwashing, is the double standard to which whistleblowers are held, depending on which side they are exposing.
Either they win a Pulitzer, or they are the scum of the earth.
If there were any justice, Catherine Herridge would have received several Pulitzer Prizes, but I don’t recommend anyone hold their breath.
“The FBI then said “Well, since se have their attorneys computers lets search them for a totally separate criminal investigation as well.” Nope, on this the AG made the right call, not without a separate warrant with probable cause to do it. I want to see the Clintons brought down just as much as anyone, but that is a shortcut that isn’t right. Get a judge to sign off on it, get a warrant, and then hell yes hand them over, but not unless there is probable cause to do it.”
You can’t defeat a completely dishonest and corrupt judiciary by following the rules laid down for others. I don’t give a rip what their rules say, when it comes to stealing a presidency and putting an international criminal in power, these rules should be shoved up their a##es.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.