Posted on 10/30/2016 7:42:21 AM PDT by Olog-hai
The latest news about the Clintons, that Hillarys case is being re-opened and that Bill got himself tremendously rich while Hillary was in office, gets to me to thinking about Bonnie and Clyde, the 1967 movie starring Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway about a real couple that worked brazenly outside the law during the 1930s Depression.
Love this line: This heres Miss Bonnie Parker. Im Clyde Barrow. We rob banks.
In Hoovers day, Hillary and Bill would have their pictures hanging in the Post Office among the 10 Most Wanted. Hows that for a familiar ring as to how the Clintons operate? Were the Clintons. The biggest schnorrers on the planet. [ ]
Bonnie and Clyde did it for the money. Hillary and Bill do it for the money. Same people. Except that Bonnie and Clyde, the real ones, were small-time. Theyre credited with no more than about a dozen hold-ups, mainly banks and grocery stores. Small potatoes compared to the Clinton Foundation that one way and another fattened the pockets of Hillary and Bill with dirty millions.
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
Hope they wind up............ well, never mind.
They are more like the Borgias: power-mad, amoral, completely ruthless. And she is every bit as bad as he is.
Or maybe like Desdemona or Lady Macbeth. Cleopatra on her bad days. Agrippina, the mother of Nero.
Bad comparison, because we know from the movie that Bonnie and Clyde made love once!
More like Nicolae and Elena.
Okay I get the analogy but as far as the 1967 movie Bonnie and Clyde is concerned there was a lot of farce in that movie. Take a look at it PBS documentaries on Bonnie and Clyde and you’ll find out that a lot of the stuff that Warren Beatty put into that 67 flick was Hollywood. there is a boatload of misrepresentation for instance, the character CW Moss never existed. The whole Frank Hammer story was different than portrayed in the 67 movie lots of other stuff was written and it didn’t happen, but if you look at that movie and think that’s how Bonnie and Clyde really were. It’s not.
I have often remarked that I would prefer to face a common thug it is usually a one time occurrence - pols on the other hand just keep on taking
And the pols are more insidious. They steal with a pen and words rather than a gun. Worst of all, they act like YOU are the bad guy if you resist!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.