Protocols for granting security clearances appear to have been all but abandoned in the last decade or so. How did 0bama get cleared? Jarrett, Abedin, etc. The list just goes on and on.
It would be “Islamophobic” to deny Muslims security clearance or to report them making bombs in their garages to police.
NASA surely wasn’t the only agency directed by BHO to “improve” relations with Muslims.
“Protocols for granting security clearances appear to have been all but abandoned in the last decade or so. How did 0bama get cleared? Jarrett, Abedin, etc. The list just goes on and on.”
That’s an excellent point, and such a basic core principle of security that it seems to continue to be overlooked. Is there some kind of unwritten rule that if the public elects these sorts that security protocol no longer applies to any of them? Are there some kind of official documented rules that state security protocol doesn’t apply to certain people?
There’s not much reason to have ANY security clearances if some people are not going to follow protocol with classified information. It’s like having a hundred foot chain capable of supporting 1000 tons, but putting one makeshift link in the middle of it fabricated out of woven dryer lint and magic pixie dust. Insanity!
How did 0bama get cleared?
He got elected.
I’ve heard our elected, president, congress members or senators do not go a clearance process. Just the fact we
had enough faith in their American belief, to elect them, they did not need a clearance.