Here is what I am wondering:
First we hear that Clinton is ahead in the polls.
Second, we then hear that the enthusiasm for those most likely to go to the polls are the ones who think their candidate has a shot at winning the election. Hitlary’s numbers start to go down after an upward swing.
Third, could the fact DT is gaining in the polls be contrived to bring momentum to Hitlary’s supporters to vote?
It has been all over the news and talk radio programs about how that if the election is over before the election actually happens, then people are less likely to vote. In this case, Hitlary’s camp declared the election over but you hear none of that hardly anymore from that side of the political spectrum. If the poll numbers can be contrived to show Hitlary winning could they not also be contrived to show that Hitlary is leading by a very small percentage to create momentum for voters to go to the polls?
Something else if the polls show DT ahead, voters that support her turn out, then she can claim she won from behind. Thus hoisting herself up higher on the petard than what she already thinks she is.