Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEMDF

Good God! That is outrageous!


17 posted on 10/27/2016 8:28:04 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: AngelesCrestHighway; NEMDF

I check with my doc, and he said he’d accept payment per visit from an individual.

That actually sounds like the cheapest way to go if a person could find a reasonable catastrophic plan someplace.


21 posted on 10/27/2016 8:33:24 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: All

The law says people under Obamacare will pay something like 4-7% of their income for premiums. Regardless of the insurance company’s premium increase.

So if someone’s income doesn’t change much, and the insurance company raises rates 50%, the person (voter) doesn’t pay any more than the previous year. The gov’t pays the increase.

The voters getting this insurance won’t care about it. The taxpayer should care about it, but hell, the Fed can just print that money.

It’s insane end to end.


24 posted on 10/27/2016 8:34:38 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson