Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheTimeOfMan

Define destroying one of our carriers. Sinking it? Crippling it? Temporarily disabling it?


10 posted on 10/25/2016 7:34:44 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

“Define destroying one of our carriers. Sinking it? Crippling it? Temporarily disabling it?”

The inability to successfully launch aircraft.


16 posted on 10/25/2016 7:46:19 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Election 2016 - Freedom or Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
"Define destroying one of our carriers. Sinking it? Crippling it? Temporarily disabling it?"

Now days ALL you have to do is blow the antennas off any ship and it's dead.

Out of the fight and a sitting duck awaiting destruction.

No radar, no comms, no aircraft control.

17 posted on 10/25/2016 7:47:06 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

I suspect that getting hit with a 1,600-lb warhead at mach 2.5 (let alone a swarm of them) would sink pretty much anything, except maybe Iowa class battleships that were made to take hits from other battleships. IIRC those missiles were a major reason Reagan reactivated the old battleships.


48 posted on 10/26/2016 1:13:54 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

” Sinking it”

Carriers are WWII relicts. They would be the first to go in a nuclear exchange. ICBM/SLBM are no longer just ballistic but targetable.


59 posted on 10/26/2016 7:57:18 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson