I understand your anger. I am and was angry about that decision as well. People get money from all kinds of places so I am not willing to convict someone without proof. I agree that there should be an investigation into that decision and/or perhaps term limits on justices.
“People get money from all kinds of places so I am not willing to convict someone without proof.”
We can’t convict anyone of anything, as we are neither judges nor jurors.
However, we can draw an informed conclusion as to what this is. I have decided to apply the “quacks like a duck” test. Even so, I know that I will remain open to facts that might tend to exonerate the depraved SOB, as I’m sure you will too.