Posted on 10/23/2016 2:26:27 PM PDT by MagillaX
Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch
From:huma@hrcoffice.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com, kristinakschake@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-16 10:52 Subject: Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch
She knows Loretta. Not an extremely close relationship and don't remember last time they connected. She was in running to be Spitzer LG years ago. Hrc wanted Leecia Eve, others pushed Lynch. Regardless, definitely a cordial relationship. I would vote for a tweet. ________________________________ From: John Podesta Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:35:43 AM To: Kristina Schake Cc: Jim Margolis; Joel Benenson; Mandy Grunwald; Jesse Ferguson; Jennifer Palmieri; Robby Mook; Jake Sullivan; Huma Abedin Subject: Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch Pretty sure she knows her, but not certain. +Huma On Mar 16, 2015 8:32 AM, "Kristina Schake" > wrote: We weren't planning to, but with the new development think we should. We could do a tweet today. Does she know Lynch? If so, we could make it more personal or do it as a statement . Copying in Jesse too. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:55 AM, John Podesta > wrote: We doing anything on this today?
She knows Loretta. Not an extremely close relationship and don't remember last time they connected. She was in running to be Spitzer LG (Lieut. General) years ago. Hrc wanted Leecia Eve, others pushed Lynch. Regardless, definitely a cordial relationship. I would vote for a tweet. ______________
From: John Podesta
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:35:43 AM
To: Kristina Schake Cc: Jim Margolis; Joel Benenson; Mandy Grunwald; Jesse Ferguson; Jennifer Palmieri; Robby Mook; Jake Sullivan; Huma Abedin Subject:
Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch
Pretty sure she knows her, but not certain. +Huma
On Mar 16, 2015 8:32 AM, "Kristina Schake" > wrote:
We weren't planning to, but with the new development think we should. We could do a tweet today. Does she know Lynch? If so, we could make it more personal or do it as a statement . Copying in Jesse too.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:55 AM, John Podesta > wrote: We doing anything on this today?
Close coordination. Very close coordination.
Not illegal, but unethical, immoral, and fattening?
Strange, isn’t it, just how detailed the political analysis and thought is for the DEMOCRAT politics, and how little the “American” progress and constitutional freedoms matter to the “democrat” minds in Washington?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.