Posted on 10/23/2016 9:41:24 AM PDT by GilGil
Those waking up to read the news this morning will undoubtedly be "shocked" by the latest ABC / Washington Post goal seeking report (aka "poll") that shows Hillary opening up a 12-point lead with likely voters after the latest debate last Wednesday. Ironically, this latest polling farce was "embargoed for release after 9 a.m." EST which will certainly make it a dominant topic of conversation on all the morning talk shows.
Of course, like many of the recent polls from the likes of Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, something curious emerges when you look just beneath the surface of the headline 12-point lead.
"METHODOLOGY This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."
As we've pointed out numerous times in the past, in response to Reuters' efforts to "tweak" their polls, per the The Pew Research Center, at least since 1992, democrats have never enjoyed a 9-point registration gap despite the folks at ABC and The Washington Post somehow convincing themselves it was a reasonable margin.
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
Whats going on with the polls?
American Thinker ^ | 22 Oct 2016 | Jared E. Peterson
Posted on 10/22/2016, 7:45:48 AM by mandaladon
Something funny is happening in the major national polling department of this presidential race and no ones talking about it.
First, somehow the narrative seems to be developing that the polls show Clinton with a near insurmountable lead.
Not so fast.
Not so fast at all.
There is a very large gap between Trump and Clintons current national standing, as revealed by Goebbels/Pravda (CBS, NBC, ABC/Washington Post), on the one hand, versus the picture painted by three respected polling organizations that are not part of the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party, on the other:
Here are some of the numbers available Friday, October 21, 2016:
Goebbels/Pravda: (with NBC and CBS as reported by RCP on the afternoon of Friday, October 21, 2016):
ABC/Washington Post: 47-43, Clinton
NBC: 51-43, Clinton
CBS: 51-40, Clinton
Non-Propaganda Machine-affiliated: (as reported on the afternoon of Friday October 21, 2016):
IBT/TIPP: 41-40, Trump
LA Times/USC Tracking: 44.5-43.8, Trump
Rasmussen: 43-41, Trump
To say theres a huge difference between the current state of the race as depicted by Goebbels/Pravda versus that shown by major independent polling organizations, would be risible understatement.
The propaganda arm of the Democratic Party is showing a runaway race, while the independents present an extremely tight one, with Trump frequently leading by a nose.
I have no idea whos right, but Im certain of this: both cant be.
As our twenty-five year olds would ask: Dude, whats up with that?
Why no discussion of this huge discrepancy?
Why the assumption by the media that its in the bag for whats her name?
By the way, regarding an item of terminology:
I submit that Goebbels/Pravda is a moniker the gang of six has more than richly earned by its collective coverage of The News in this presidential election.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3483549/posts
However, what Trump supporters should consider is the Kentucky Governors race. Matt Bevin, a Trump like figure, was 5 points down in all the polls on election day. He won by 9.
In Michigan, Hillary was up 18 points the day of the primary. We know that she lost Michigan. I’m just not sure how much. At least 18.1% failure on their part.
That’s what I keep thinking. These idiots are going to convince themselves that Clinton has won, so why bother to vote. And us supporting Trump will end up being seriously enraged enough to push forward and get involved and make it happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.