Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA

The larger ‘bonus’ payment was what they were told they would get, not something ‘extra’ by ‘mistake’.

The CNG was giving out larger bonuses to boost reenlistments. But supposedly these larger amounts were not approved by the US government who were reimbursing the CNG.

Now after an audit, the US government wants the extra ‘non approved’ amounts back from the CNG. So the CNG now wants it back from the soldiers.


63 posted on 10/23/2016 10:58:56 AM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: chaosagent

.
>> “Now after an audit, the US government wants the extra ‘non approved’ amounts back from the CNG. So the CNG now wants it back from the soldiers.” <<

Tough titty for the CNG!

The statute of limitations on this crap is likely long past.
.


64 posted on 10/23/2016 11:02:02 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: chaosagent

OK, but why would the CNG offer bonuses it knew weren’t approved or funded? None of this is adding up, frankly.

I’m not arguing that the soldiers didn’t deserve every last penny, just that there’s something fishy along the line here. I know when my son joined the Army (not the Guard) he had a contract. He committed to a certain MOS, and to serve for four years; the Army promised him $X, in writing, if he fulfilled the contract. How did the CNG make promises, not put it in writing, as part of the reenlistment effort? Didn’t the soldiers have any kind of contract? It was all just wide open?


67 posted on 10/23/2016 11:50:29 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson