Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck

Why is this not common knowledge? If true, it needs to be brought to SCOTUS under one of the Civil Rights Acts. How does a consent decree in a single state cover a Federal election?

It happened over 30 years ago and was never publicized?

Sounds like the recourse is to rename the GOP or have a candidate challenge in their own name. Alternatively, thumb their nose at the decree and bring suit, anyway. If this was reversed, the DNC would have long ago found ways around it.


49 posted on 10/20/2016 9:24:09 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reformedliberal

I’ve seen this referred to several times over the years. I believe it to be true.


72 posted on 10/20/2016 10:15:46 PM PDT by upchuck (Trump to the White House!! Hillary to the Big House!! h/t Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson