Posted on 10/20/2016 6:41:55 AM PDT by xzins
LAS VEGAS, Nevada — Retired Army Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn tells Breitbart News he thinks Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s “unbelievable victory” in the final presidential debate against his Democratic opponent was “exactly what we needed.”
“I think this was an unbelievable victory for Trump,” Flynn, a top Trump surrogate, said in an exclusive interview.
I think this was amazing. He was so on point, so on message. He gave very precise answers. You listen, for those that watched it tonight, you saw a robot-like script coming out of Hillary Clinton with no new ideas. No new ideas at all. Donald Trump gave some amazing ideas tonight and he showed America what he’s going to do for jobs. He showed America what he’s going to do to help out our immigration and all the kinds of things we’re involved in.
Flynn says he was shocked at Hillary Clinton’s claims in the debate that she doesn’t support open borders, when a transcript of a paid speech she gave to a Brazilian bank shows she specifically said she supports “open borders” and “open trade.”
“She’s totally for open borders,” Flynn told Breitbart News.
Just look at what’s in her emails that have come out. She wants like a United States of North America not a United States of America. She would prefer to have just wide open like they have over in Europe right now. If you don’t have any borders you don’t have a country. This was an unbelievable victory for Donald Trump. It was exactly what we needed. So from our standpoint this is exactly what this camp needed because we are going to have so much momentum going into the final weeks of this election and this was exactly what we wanted tonight.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Yeah, I heard either Hannity or Howie Carr laughing at the feeble defense of that one. "Open borders means the free exchange of energy commerce...everybody says that"
Sounds like a desperate lie.
It's the "Mother of all Whoppers".
I’m not familiar enough with all her job description to know, but if she was able to do harm with Benghazi by ignoring it, then maybe she’d be in such a loop herself.
It’s hard to tell sometimes what the real picture is (her responsibilities) with all this shuckin’ and jivin’ from on high going on!
That sounds like a sound answer. Before she said this, I had absolutely no idea how long it would take. I’m sure others with experience may know roughly. But, for people like myself - she just informed the entire world.
Yes, she was “writing” when Trump was in rebuttal so there was no need to take notes. The “writing” was doodles so she could read her little teleprompter or listen to her earpiece. The doodles are plain as day on those pics showing her notepad and light.
When she made points by hitting the podium, she used that as an excuse to look down. A normal person striking something to make a point looks directly at the camera to send the message home. Not her.
All that nodding can’t be just her illness. I’d say a lot of it was listening to the earpiece.
Why would she say such a thing rather than some generality like “pretty quick”?
It’s like, look at how smart “I” am.
No, Madam Secretary. That was not smart.
Harry Truman once said that you could not get rich in politics unless you were a crook. The Clintons have amassed over $250 million during their years in politics, and want even more. Corrupt Hillary is a lying sick old crook, who accepts bribes and betrays our country. Everything she says and does, or causes to be said or done, must be viewed with the utmost suspicion. Her promises are worthless, unless they enrich her in some way. Her husband is a rapist and a pedophile whom she has actively enabled
Just me, but I favor no income tax, no business tax, and only sales tax. If you buy something, then you pay the tax.
All at the same rate.
If you buy more, then you’ll pay more.
However, considering I’ll never see that in my lifetime, I suppose the next best would be a tax rate of about 20% on everybody. I don’t see the point in some paying nothing. Nor do I see the point in some paying for everyone else.
I would take all expenses directly off the top of ANY income, so that I’d only tax PROFITS for both individuals and businesses.
And then she tweets about it and make jokes about it on her twitter account! It’s still up! I posted the link at #42.
Face to face, I’d break the jaw of a man who introduced himself so rudely.
She said ‘hemispheric’, didn’t she. She wants a bigger bite even than Heidi Cruz. Heidi wanted North America, while Hillary wants all of North, South, and Central Americas.
“Next morning, the one residual left over for me the next morning is that Hillary Clinton is eager to start a nuclear war.”
Death hugs Hillary like a miasma.
Well isn’t that special!!
She does not know the implications. It’s almost, to me, like she wants to brag about where she’d be, with such a “small number.”
A majority of us are.
I thought Chris Matthews and Nichole Wallace and Madow looked/ acted pretty unhinged last night....
I thought ......well OK then, Trump WON!
Which is a good international political reason why the US wouldn’t bandy that around.
There would be some logistical reasons, too, like not letting somebody like China know how close it needed to park a nuclear sub or other countermeasure. The iffier the picture our enemies have, the more likely we are to evade them.
Have you heard the four minute response time statement being discussed on any of the news media today? The only place I heard it was here on FR. I think that’s very damaging to here. Media more concerned about Trumps hesitation to concede defeat.
My #1 takeaway from the debate is that Hillary! is going to spend more money. Some of it might be worthy, some not. But, in the end, someone has to pay for it. Who?
Meanwhile, Trump is going to lower taxes, particularly on corporations, and provide incentives for them to bring money that's currently stashed overseas back into the USA.
So, technically, Hillary is correct (lowering taxes on corporations and "rich" people) ...BUT... What does she think that the corps and the rich will do with the money? Burn stacks of $100 bills to heat their mansions? Of course not, they'll invest in more jobs, more equipment, more assets to grow their companies so they can make MORE money, hire MORE people, etc etc etc.
She's no fool, though. Class warfare sells well, particularly among the stupid and envious.
THAT one truth alone proves illary cares not a whit about black lives and has used them to enrich her lowness. THAT truth should accumulate 75% of the black vote in Donald Trumps column.
But of course, the enemy inside the wore (read mainstream media and devils like Wallace, et al) will carefully conceal THAT TRUTH about the illaryness.
Trump said he’ll challenge a fraudulent result.
If the Super Bowl were obviously rigged would it be wrong for the opposing coach to challenge it?
The media is idiotic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.