Posted on 10/20/2016 5:36:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
Democrats this cycle have made a big deal of saying the system is rigged. Its insane and damaging, which is typical for progressives. But its also the core of the collectivist mindset.
To be fair, the system is rigged just not in the way Democrats say it is.
President Barack Obama and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., both from relatively modest means, now have fortunes not through creating businesses or jobs but by driving home this rigged idea. They claim people were able to take risks and build businesses solely because someone else paved the roads.
These self-righteous multi-millionaires discount the fact that those roads are paid for by everyone who uses them. They wont acknowledge some use them to better the lives of themselves and fellow citizens, but others use them to go to the bar and this is a reflection of choices they made, not some societal flaw.
But thats not the rigging Im talking about. Democrats big lie is to talk about how earnings inequality is somehow existential and has nothing to do with personal choices and risk taking. They know the system is not rigged; its more of an excuse progressives use to absolve those who fail of their own accord. It justifies everything. I didnt get the job? Its not that I blew the interview or someone was more qualified its because the system is rigged.
Its insidious, and evil, to do that to people. But it works, and individuals are disposable to progressives, so they do it.
Still, not rigging.
Whats being rigged now is the election.
Ive been unambiguous in my criticism of Donald Trump, but he is absolutely correct the electoral system is rigged. He narrows it to being against him, but it would be rigged against any Republican who ran this year. Its that rigged.
Im not talking about voter fraud, though well likely see plenty of that. Im talking about the media.
If theres one thing this election cycle has exposed its just how symbiotic the relationship between the Democratic Party and the media is. Newspapers might as well run Democratic press releases with reporters bylines at this point. Television journalists should just attach a GoPro camera to the hand of whichever DNC official happens to be operating their mouth at any given time. Might as well get a colonoscopy while theyre up there.
And up there is where journalistic standards are, along with many of their heads.
Journalism has been a joke for a long time, but 2016 made it the punch line as well.
As reporters fall over each other to report the latest allegation against or gaffe by Trump, they actively ignore everything negative about Clinton.
Wikileaks has exposed the inner workings of the Clinton campaign the bigotry, the knowing lies, the attempted cover-ups, the horse-trading, the corrupt in-breeding with journalists but youd never know it watching network news. Theyve barely mentioned it.
Its not surprising. Journalists and contributors from just about every major media outlet have been exposed by Wikileaks of doing one or more of the following:
--Run stories past Clinton campaign officials for their approval.
--Offer help in framing stories to aid Clinton.
--Give Clinton advice and even a town hall question ahead of time.
--Actively root for Hillary.
--Attend dinner parties for campaign insiders and even throw them.
And thats just the tip of the iceberg in the cozy, even incestuous relationships Wikileaks exposed.
Add to that the FBI report of a quid pro quo offer to change classified material to unclassified by a State Department official on behalf of the Clinton campaign as well as the unrivaled corruption of liberal groups coordinating with the Clinton campaign to incite violence and commit voter fraud exposed by Project Veritas and, well nothing.
These revelations have come to light only because people outside the media sought them out. Aside from casual mentions and quick dismissals, the mainstream media has mostly ignored them.
In the case of Wikileaks, the journalistic malpractice is self-preservation. Journalists are hesitant to report on the behind-the-scenes partisanship of fellow journalists because theyre friends, and its possible whoever reported it will have a similar email from them released next.
On the FBI, the media simply doesnt care. The perfect illustration of how this was covered is in this exchange between Howard Dean and Thomas Roberts of MSNBC. Neither has even a basic understanding of the issue at hand, or even a clue. Yet there they were, on national television, declaring something they obviously had no knowledge of to be irrelevant. Itd be laughable were it not so sad.
As for the Project Veritas findings, even after one fraudster was fired and another resigned, the media ignored it. There is video of two Democratic operatives discussing how to commit voter fraud and confessing to paying people to incite violence at Trump rallies staged events the media covered ad nauseam and they dont rate a mention let alone a correction. A search of the Washington Post and New York Times websites Tuesday night return zero results on the topic. (The Post wrote a story Wednesday as this was being submitted.)
Yes, the system is rigged. Not by the rich against the poor, but by those with press passes against those who expect them to provide honest information.
Media bias isnt just how they cover what they cover; its what they choose to ignore. The profession that congratulates itself with more awards and honors than any other and prides itself for speaking truth to power has been fully exposed as the shield and the sword for the powerful. That is a rigged system.
This column sums it up well. The complicity of the so-called media lays bare the myth of a free and independent press in this country.
Yes, the MSM is rigged. But what is the solution? Some gubermint review board? No, that is a complete First Amendment horror show.
Fox News was the first to break the mold and report from the right (although the extent is arguable). But what happened once they locked up the ratings war and reaped the benefits? They started to move left, which is natural assuming they recognized they had a lock on the right and the only way to increase market share was to appeal to the LIV, the squishy middle.
Ask yourself, why has NO major media outlet done the same and moved right, even by baby steps, to increase THEIR market share? The only logical conclusion is that the rewards for staying in lockstep far outweigh any marketplace gain. Thus, this is confirmation of the rigging. QED
The only hope is the bright light of sunshine to expose the collusion, the insider quid pro quos, flush out the players and get this unholy cabal exposed. For that reason, I see those leaking information and doing the undercover work as True Patriots.
Some time ago, the Kock Bros let it be known that they wanted to buy NBC and the Left went crazy. If someone like them were to get a hold of an MSM outlet, I’d be willing to bet that things could have a very good chance of changing. For one, Fox would have some much needed competition. Two, there’d be another outlet, not cable, for the people to get their news/info from.
One of the solutions is simple to understand talking points - put out on Facebook and twitter. They are more effective than we realize.
Trump wants Supreme Court justices who interpret the Constitution - Hillary wants people to make laws based on their feelings.
Trump wants the borders secured - Clinton wants open borders - take the doors off your house for a week and let me know how Clinton’s open borders plan works for you.
Trump wants to keep terrorist out of our country. Clinton takes $50 mil from the Saudis, another $5 mill from Qatar - the wikileaks show both countries financially and logistically support ISIS - she laughed when Donald Trump explained that the countries does business with throw gays off roofs and abuses women - so much for Clinton’s championing the rights of women and children.
Excellent article!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.