Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, I suppose there are people out there that are still not aware of the dangers of the results of this (s)election and possible threat to our freedoms. Gotta say, the lsm is doing a fine job of doing nothing to shed the light of day on the progressives while constantly digging anything up they can about DJT. Hopefully their actions are just strengthening the resolve of the Trumpsters. Of course they'll claim they're not infringing, just regulating. Uh, guess "they" must have changed the definition of "infringe" since the last time I looked it up. Then again, they don't care.
1 posted on 10/19/2016 4:49:02 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

The gun haters just say that they are not infringing the right to keep and bear arms, by defining the right as virtually non-existent.

It is hard to “infringe” something that does not exist.


2 posted on 10/19/2016 4:55:55 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I and every Trump supporter I know have this issue front and center. We can’t get to the booth quickly enough to vote. I’m willing to bet the vast majority of Trump supporters feel the same way. I know people who don’t particularly like DJT who are voting to protect the SCOTUS and Heller. Unfortunately, a great number of people don’t know, don’t care, or agree with this lunacy.

This issue right here tells you everything you need to know about the craven #nevertrump crowd and their supposed principles. There is no surviving four years to try and unseat Hillary...if she’s in our rights are GONE and they won’t be coming back,


3 posted on 10/19/2016 4:57:10 AM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
The gun rights act of 1968 (?) opened the door for all this abominable attack on the 2nd.

THAT'S the law that makes a felon ineligible to own, and a bunch of other peripherals ... a gun ... ever.

THAT law negates the 'right" the 2nd guarantees, and it is always explained to the felon that "you gave up your right when you .. ", which is ludicrous.

I was a kid and I hot boxed a car or OK, but I spent 10 years in prison and I am now a pastor, or a father of 6, or the owner of a million dollar company ...

Nope, you gave up your right when you ....

Unless and until that monstrosity is repealed, the 2nd has a chink in its armor.

4 posted on 10/19/2016 5:02:23 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it pisses people off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Leftists don't want to just infringe 2nd amendment rights.

They want to totally eliminate them.

in·fringe

inˈfrinj/
verb: infringe; 3rd person present: infringes; past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed; gerund or present participle: infringing

actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).

"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"

synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach, disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of; disregard, ignore, neglect; go beyond, overstep, exceed, infract, restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on;

"the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights"

antonyms: obey, comply with, act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

"his legal rights were being infringed"


6 posted on 10/19/2016 5:20:31 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Unintended Consequences by John Ross and Enemies: Foreign and Domestic by Matt Bracken (our very own Travis McGee) are my all time favorite 2nd Amendment books.


7 posted on 10/19/2016 5:23:49 AM PDT by gop4lyf (Gay marriage is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

‘...at how an individual chooses to exercise his or her Second Amendment rights...’

Words to pay attention to. Libs dont envision a gun free society but rather one in which they get to pick who has and has-not. Their problem isnt with guns but who gets to have them. Their society is one in which the govt and favored groups are armed but the reaminder arent. This makes it easier to force their adgenda on the unarmed and to erradicate those groups viewed as inferior.


10 posted on 10/19/2016 5:44:15 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson