So are you defending Hillary? The study is tight, they looked at actual results measured against fraud potential state-by-state and they found glaring anomalies. Actual results diverged inexplicably from predicted results in the most vulnerable states, suggesting that manipulation of data in many, if not most, of the most populous precincts. I doubt that Bernie’s people have seen this, I think might have been a game-changer had it been publicized. You’ll note that the authors seem to have no skin in the game, but found results that clearly speak to vote tampering.
I'm not defending Crooked. I am questioning the conclusion of the study, based on my view of the underlying data.