Trump says that Republicans are being 'naive' about voter fraud. (they like it that way)

AP ^ | October 17, 2016 | Kathy Hennessey

[\/\/ayne]

Trump should have John Fund or Hans Von Spakovsky make up a PDF with links of proven voter fraud to hand to reporters.

Members of the press have become 'accidentally' corrupt.... newsrooms downsized - leaving 'journalists' with the best BLACK BOOKS - - liberal contacts. . Men like John Dickerson, Chuck Todd, and Anderson Cooper quickly start 'talking over' any conservative who 'speaks truth' they don't want their audience to hear - and more importantly that THEY don't want to hear... If Dickerson, Todd, and Cooper were sent a packet of proof on voter fraud they would throw it away... Cognitive dissonance is an understatement in the average newsroom. On some level these folks know they're lying... as do all of us who watch them squirming, ducking diving and eluding..... FoxNews is just as bad...

Agree except I don't think FoxNews is as bad, they do report on some election fraud. However, my point is that when they shout questions "do you have any proof of election fraud" he hands out the sheet. And he could have it on his website. Also, during an event Trump can say something like "the press doesn't believe in election fraud so we're giving them the proof" and documents come fluttering down from above into the press pen. Point being to illustrate how they know and are pretending to not know.

[ManHunter]

No, Donald, they’re not naïve; they’re complicit. There have been several documented cases of voter fraud in the last 30 years (and others prior to that), but the Republican “leadership” has refused to exercise its constitutional powers in every single case. They KNOW it happens, but they also know they can get “concessions” and “considerations” by not pursuing the remedies available to them.

[ohioman]

I think that Trump is using the term naïve right now to give others in the GOP time to jump on this train. If in a few weeks they have not hopped on board, then he will use the term COMPLICIT, which we all know is the more adequate term.

[ManHunter]

I completely agree. (I confess that my fuse is getting shorter on a daily basis as we approach this election.)

[JimRed]

Someone counts the red bodies going in to vote. If 800 people go in wearing red and Trump only gets 400 votes, fraud has occurred.

Then they'll be able to target you on your way to the polls, and try to make sure you don't arrive there!

[GOPJ]

Agree except I don't think FoxNews is as bad, they do report on some election fraud. However, my point is that when they shout questions "do you have any proof of election fraud" he hands out the sheet. And he could have it on his website. Also, during an event Trump can say something like "the press doesn't believe in election fraud so we're giving them the proof" and documents come fluttering down from above into the press pen. Point being to illustrate how they know and are pretending to not know.

Great ideasx - - and you're right that FoxNews isn't as bad - - but they are moving in that direction...

[\/\/ayne]

We need a great army of vigilant citizen watchers at the polls, willing to tackle ballot stuffers and bussed trolls and other tampering with the same courage as the passengers of Flt 93 battering the cockpit door.

Well, yes, of course that too. I'll be at a polling station from open to close on election day.

[onedoug]

Hugh Hewitt’s “If It Isn’t Close They Can’t Cheat” seems apropo.

[MayflowerMadam]

Republicans never have been naïve about voter fraud. It’s just that nobody in power has tried to do anything about it. Maintaining the status quo has been more important than doing the right thing.

[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

Bush 41 1988- enabled it -Motor Voter

Bush 43- 2000- large scale fraud almost cost him the crown

Bush 43- 2004- did nothing to prevent the same fraud for his reelection.

[gogeo]

Stand back!!! He’s lashing out!!!