Good grief man!
Do you know how to do a Google search for an article? By the way, when someone says this... that can be any search engine (Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, etc).
One more thing if you are going to say someone source is false, then the burden of proof is on YOU to prove it. Nevertheless, this time I figured I would help you out.
Here you go,
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/rnc-donald-trump-ad-spending-229711
and
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/10/the-rnc-has-spent-usd0-on-tv-ads-for-trump.html
What are you talking about?
Your strident post is not responsive to what I wrote at all. The site linked is one I would not revisit after reading the article, all of the comments and abstracts of other articles. The piece linked was an opinion piece, no facts.
What would a google/bing/etc search have done? In the final analysis after searching and reading you still need to weigh, consider and make up your own mind in any case. My mind says the writer &, sadder yet, the commenters are lost in pettiness and hypocrisy. Have a different opinion? Fine that’s what makes horse races.
I don’t argue with the ad spending numbers at all. They don’t surprise me. The establishment hates Trump and sees him as the demise of their gravy train. The site is not a proTrump site however and they are using these numbers to bash Trump and make the point that the establishment is right to refuse to support him. Also pushing the meme that Trump is spiraling downhill. Loser propaganda.