Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: virgil

“If Obama would keep his nose out of Syria, there would be less dead people there.”

Exactly. That begs the question “why are we in Syria”?


4 posted on 10/14/2016 9:16:26 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Parley Baer

“why are we in Syria”?

To support Obama’s failed attempt to install the Muslim Brotherhood in yet another country. Arab Spring, YEAH!


7 posted on 10/14/2016 9:22:30 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Hillary Clinton AKA The Potemkin Princess of the Potomac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer

Damned shame Reggie Love didnt have AIDS, isnt it!/S


8 posted on 10/14/2016 9:23:12 PM PDT by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer

Because some idjit drew a line in the sand then buried his head up to his arse there too.


15 posted on 10/14/2016 9:39:28 PM PDT by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer
“why are we in Syria”?

Because Saudi Arabia says so.

20 posted on 10/14/2016 10:07:58 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (Nuke Saudi Arabia now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer

Syria is about competing schemes for natgas pipelines. Assad refused to go with the version favored by Saudi, Israel, Qatar, and Turkey.


26 posted on 10/15/2016 12:43:18 AM PDT by ganeemead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Parley Baer; virgil; BenLurkin; Lurkina.n.Learnin; zaxtres
The US's intervention in Syria was a two step process.

The first step was in May 2013 when the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 15-3 to arm the rebels(tow anti tank weapons) .

Senate panel delivers bipartisan rebuke to Obama with vote to arm Syrian rebels

So the CIA would begin vetting, training and arming the rebels.

Then after ISIS came on the scene, Congress would pass legislation to deal with that, but that legislation contained a sizable increase in the money allocated to arm the rebels and it transferred the duty from CIA to the military.

Gradually, these weapons turned the tide and the rebels began to gain the upper hand against the Syrian army.

Because of this, Putin had to send in his military(aircraft and missiles) to help Assad defeat the rebels.

But, Putin has been there over a year and he still hasn't captured Aleppo so he has had to ratchet down a couple more notches

31 posted on 10/15/2016 4:29:12 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson