Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT says no libel, no retraction, no apology for Trump story
Associated Press ^ | Oct 13, 2016 8:51 PM EDT

Posted on 10/13/2016 8:56:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2016 8:56:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Sue them.

Own them.

Make Ann Coulter the Editor in Chief.


2 posted on 10/13/2016 8:58:14 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Sue the women.

Only way to make the pay received from Democrat party not worth the effort. Sue the women.

Sue the women!


3 posted on 10/13/2016 8:58:39 PM PDT by Lopeover (The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

All the women have been fraudulent

And most of the accounts were lifted from other articles, just the names were changed

Or even one account was a song lyric....

New York Times is disgusting

My neighbor works for the New York Times, just happens to be a Trump supporter.....


4 posted on 10/13/2016 8:59:06 PM PDT by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Unfortunately for the Slimes, falsehood is not an absolute defense to libel...
5 posted on 10/13/2016 8:59:22 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Example must be made of crazy bat crap communist women! Sue them!

Sue them!


6 posted on 10/13/2016 9:00:00 PM PDT by Lopeover (The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover

Sue the women. They are the weak link, they’ll flip and testify against the NYT.


7 posted on 10/13/2016 9:02:41 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr
Sue the women. They are the weak link, they’ll flip and testify against the NYT.

DITTO...sue the lying women !

8 posted on 10/13/2016 9:07:01 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic EnemyKristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Dear New York Times,

There is NOTHING Mr. Donald Trump can do that would change my vote for him, so please quit embarrassing yourself.


9 posted on 10/13/2016 9:09:21 PM PDT by KittenClaws ( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“In a letter, Times attorney David McCraw said Trump “has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women”

When did Trump do that?

In the leaked video he was talking about what women would “let” him do. This is one of those lies that the left figures at least some people will believe if it’s repeated over and over again.


10 posted on 10/13/2016 9:11:12 PM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

http://www.unz.com/article/an-obituary-of-the-new-york-times/


11 posted on 10/13/2016 9:13:43 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

One woman, Rachel Crooks that claimed she was treated inappropriately by Trump had friends and relatives posting on Facebook that when she actually encountered Trump years ago she had only good things to say about him and they did not believe the story she is telling now. They said she claimed at the time Trump said he would help her with a modeling career and she never heard any more from him so they think she is being spiteful and used by the media. She deleted her Facebook because so many that knew her were saying they did not believe her story.

Not sure if it was one of these two women or if it was another one. At times today people were saying three women are saying he was inappropriate with them.


12 posted on 10/13/2016 9:14:58 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

ummm he did not say he bragged about “non-consensual” touching— that consent or non-consent is in the NYT’s imagination from what he said..


13 posted on 10/13/2016 9:15:10 PM PDT by freespirit2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

New York Times, you get to decide if you want to apologize or retract, but you don`t get to decide whether you`re guilty of lible or not. That`s for the courts to decide.


14 posted on 10/13/2016 9:15:44 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junk Silver

Don’t look for logic in all this.


15 posted on 10/13/2016 9:16:10 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ok NYT’s when it all comes down, you guys are first.


16 posted on 10/13/2016 9:17:32 PM PDT by Bullish (The fly on Hillary's foreheadknows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arl295
My neighbor works for the New York Times, just happens to be a Trump supporter.....

I worked there in the 1990s. I have two friends from there I still stay in touch with, both conservatives. We were scattered about there but we did have a presence.

17 posted on 10/13/2016 9:19:08 PM PDT by NJRighty ("It's sick out there and getting sicker" - Bob Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Twenty years have gone by and no lawsuit by the Clintons against all the women who have been accusing him all that time of sexual assault. Trump invites several real victims to the last debate, then since last Sunday, Clinton’s false witnesses springup.Finally, the ‘rats are transparent.


18 posted on 10/13/2016 9:19:45 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He never said it was non-consensual, you liars!


19 posted on 10/13/2016 9:20:03 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirit2012

Details, details. You`re splitting hairs. /s


20 posted on 10/13/2016 9:20:08 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson