Posted on 10/12/2016 2:10:04 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
They really should have just put Podesta as the moderator—Trump’s treatment would have been better.
I am serious—because Podesta is at least smart enough not to let his bias be obvious (at least in public, tee hee hee :-) )
You are correct = from Wiki:
On October 11, 2006, The Washington Post revealed that *****Wallace had been a registered Democrat for more than two decades. Wallace explained his party affiliation in terms of pragmatism, insisting that being a Democrat is the only feasible means of participating in the political process in heavily Democratic Washington, D.C. He maintained he had voted for candidates from both major parties in the past.[26]******
Not likely that he will go outside the Uniparty!!
Ah, that explains his saying that he has “... a man-crush on [Mitt] Romney” years ago.
I hope Trump has opposition research on Wallace. If he gets out of line, hammer him.
While all this about Wallace is true; he’s has only 1 observable driving intention; to score slimeball points with his fellow presstitutes by slanting everything in Hillary’s favor.
Don’t have much faith in him but when commission first announced him as moderator of last debate he stated on Fox that he would wait to compose his questions until after the first two debates to see what was NOT asked about,then he would go there.So we will wait and see,Benghazi? Her secret server? How about the thousands of wikileaks?
Should be a real barnburner,a lot of reputations on the line here
Unfortunately Chris Wallace is a registered Democrat. True.
Question 4....Why did you incarcerate a man who is guilty only of poor taste in producing a video when you knew the attack was unrelated to it?
Hardly any of the questions are “questions”. They are accusations when given to the Rep. and warm fuzzies when given to the Dem. So many start out “it has been alleged that....” or “some say...” and that is supposed to be accepted as an assumption and then defended. Generally it is never what we really want to know about or need to know about.
Wallace in the first GOP Kelly debate asked negative questions addressed to Trump along with Kelly and Brett.
Ailes and Murdoch ordered him to do so but ahe now risks Hannity and O’Reilly backlash if he Pearl Harbors Trump.
At any rate Trump will be preparred.
I listen to Trump events and the microphones don’t make him sound like Darth Vader inhaling
this Ocala Trump rally was his best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtkgxyZN8qU
Megyn Kelly is probably securing Wallace’s adherence to the Clinton agenda as we post.
Wallace will be as bitchy as Martha Radditz was.
I can’t stand Chris Wallace... he will surely go after Trump more than the others did. You can bet on that.
I still have the idea that because of all the emails being deleted, and now showing up, I think Clinton will drop doing the third debate.
Their new narrative, is they don’t remember them, or they were altered.
We can pressure Fox and Wallace all we want, but if she doesn’t show, she controls the Narrative.
Don’t just pressure Chris Wallace. Spam the Commission on Presidential Debates, too.
media@debates.org
(202) 872-1020.
Yes. As Ive already said, I expect him to be the worst so far. Just to prove Fox is not right wing. What a firkin’ joke. Except its not funny at all.
He seems the type who might at least to some extent respond to pressure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.