Posted on 10/12/2016 11:54:50 AM PDT by God luvs America
> *For my question*, it's basically some variation of [not quite phrased > right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all > struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with > answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email > addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was > viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure > documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and > delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to > weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of > thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
She dissappeared for 6 weeks in the beginning of the year.
Am I the only one who remembers that?
It would take a while to review and delete 30,000 emails
Oh my, and then she poured Clorox on them.
Formatted:
*For my question*, it’s basically some variation of [not quite phrased right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
Anyone else would be charged with multiple felonies
” I WAS THAT OFFCIAL ! “
This appears to be incredibly damning material. Am I mistaken in its huge significance?
We’ve got a naked-Empress situation here. She’s fooling a lot of the people all the time and she’s living in that silly echo chamber.
*
For one person to review and delete it would be one email per minute for 12 hours a day for seven days a week for five weeks to delete 30,000 emails. Call me skeptical if these were actually reviewed and instead were just bulk deleted.
thanks....
Has anyone added up all of the felonies (so far, I mean)?
Also of interest might the cumulative total prison time that she should be liable for, assuming conviction.
.
Everything WikiLeaks has been putting out there today is of huge significance.
Problem is that most of the country who relies on the MSM for news has not a clue this is happening.
Quite possible she did categorize them (like I might, oh here are all the ads from Target, into the deep six they go) and then deleted categories. It would need less than a month to do this.
During my 30 years of working on classified programs, I saw clearances revoked and job termination for a lot less. Even if I agreed with a majority of her political stances (thank God I don't), this alone would prevent me from voting for her. I just don't think the average voter realizes the severity of what she has done.
maybe assagne was right when he said the next batch would have her indicted...i mean philosophically speaking..
It’s YUGE!!! It’s series!!!
The really damning piece is where they discussed what they were doing prior to the deletions and rationalized the excuses they could tell Congress.
It’s going to take a “Trump” to raise a noise about this, I think.
“Everything WikiLeaks has been putting out there today is of huge significance. Problem is that most of the country who relies on the MSM for news has not a clue this is happening.”
The problem might be information overload. Too many bombshells for immediate digestion/understanding.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.