Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seastay
The explanation is in the article. No e-mail was deleted. The Bush White House said they could not locate e-mails due to a server upgrade. All the e-mails were found in 2009, apparently having been mislabeled. It was just a technical bookkeeping error. Again, nobody in the Bush White House deleted these 22 million e-mails. Also, the e-mails are not public yet because they are secure or classified.

Eventually, the Bush White House admitted it had lost 22 million emails, not 5 million. Then, in December 2009—well into Barack Obama’s administration—the White House said it found 22 million emails, dated between 2003 and 2005, that it claimed had been mislabeled. That cache was given to the National Archives, and it and other plaintiffs agreed, on December 14, 2009, to settle their lawsuit. But the emails have not yet been made available to the public.

The Washington Post, in an editorial, accepted the White House explanation that the emails could have been lost due to flawed IT systems.

68 posted on 10/11/2016 9:21:22 PM PDT by JediJones (Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

IIRC, archiving executive emails is required, but access to them is restricted until years later (2020 or thereabouts for GWB).. the thinking being that it is in the national interest to document the ongoings in the white house and allowing earlier access would lead to abandoning email and loss of the discussions/decision-process.


72 posted on 10/11/2016 9:44:46 PM PDT by leakinInTheBlueSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson