The question I have is: Are any of the tactics Hillary used to defend that scum now disallowed under rape shield laws? If so, he should attack with that... if not, just lawyer stuff. Heck, maybe even try to pivot on the taxes to this... when hit again on taxes at the next debate... “I take advantage of every means allowed under the law to minimize my taxes paid so I can employ as many people as necessary and you attack me for it... say I should pay more than the law demands... yet when attacking the credibility of a child rape victim in trial was allowed prior to rape shield laws, you chose to take advantage of the what was allowed to shatter the life of a 12 yr old rape victim... to get your client off the hook... since you oppose taking deductions allowed under the law, should we take your actions in court to mean you are opposed to rape shield laws? I am calling for you to release all correspondence, emails, letters, and phone records related to your defense of that client and any accused rapist, including your husband. You have made it clear that you have a public stance and a private stance on issues... The American people deserve to know your private positions on the rights of rape victims.”
Her case never came to trial-- it ended in a plea bargain-- so it's hard to say. Even harder for me to say, because I haven't represented anyone accused of a sex crime in almost 30 years; my practice today is white-collar crime (mostly tax evasion) and civil litigation.