It’s going to take a constitutional amendment to reinforce the protection of life and prohibit genetic discrimination (killing a baby because it is the “Wrong” sex or being discriminated against because you are prone to health conditions for reasons of heredity).
Carts never belong before horses, and a law only does as much good as the consensus that brings it to bear, a bolster to a weak resolve.
Personhood amendments sound wonderful, till our lawyer set gets its hands on them (and they may do so for the sake of being devil’s advocates).
A natural-family amendment would make more sense — that all policy will be weighed in the light of such consideration.