Skip to comments.
‘High Prosecution Case’ - Jeff Sessions Calls For Investigation Of FBI For Handling Of Clinton Probe
Daily Caller ^
| 10-6-2016
| CHRISTIAN DATOC
Posted on 10/06/2016 9:48:38 PM PDT by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
Jeff Sessions thinks the United States Senate should investigate the FBI for its handling of the probe into Hillary Clintons email server, specifically the way the bureau granted Cheryl Mills immunity and appeared to destroy evidence pertinent to the investigation
This is scary to me, Sessions added. I tried not to be critical of Comey at first.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: capons; comey; corruption; fbi; hillary; jeffsessions; kabukiparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: teletech
The FBI agents know they are between a rock and a hard place if they speak up. They appear to be taking the coward's way out. Shame on them.
61
posted on
10/07/2016 10:28:18 AM PDT
by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: Edward.Fish
How about posting the salient parts showing the treason so the whole pdf doesn’t have to be searched looking for it?
Thanks.
62
posted on
10/07/2016 10:36:52 AM PDT
by
Syncro
(Facts is facts)
To: Syncro
How about posting the salient parts showing the treason so the whole pdf doesnt have to be searched looking for it?
Thanks. It's meant as a proof, ironclad, of treason -- though the salient point can be said in a single sentence:
The institution of the Iran Deal w/o its removal from the official list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, publicly and officially acknowledged enemies of the several states, is Treason.
But stating it this way it becomes more of an assertion than a proof.
To: Edward.Fish
“Sessions openly participated in an act of treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemies of these United States: proof.”
Thanks anyway.
64
posted on
10/07/2016 10:58:16 AM PDT
by
Syncro
(Facts is facts)
To: Syncro
Question: Did Sessions vote aye on the Iran Deal?
If he did, then he openly committed Treason. (The Iran Deal gave aid and comfort to Iran.)
It is a matter of public record that, yes, he did vote for it.
To: MNDude
Yes, surely not all agents love the Clintons or are willing to commit perjury to protect them.
To: Edward.Fish
67
posted on
10/07/2016 11:29:13 AM PDT
by
Syncro
(Facts is facts)
To: Edward.Fish
Awful. Thanks for the info.
68
posted on
10/07/2016 11:57:35 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation)
To: teletech; politicianslie
69
posted on
10/07/2016 12:02:53 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation)
To: teletech
I bet Obama has the FBI on a very short leash.Obama has the DOJ, the FBI and the MSM on a short lease. Many are no longer controlled, they realize that Hitler has nothing on Obama's NSA. He knows what they think.
To survive, they have to let the chain of command know they are loyal and owned BY THE ONE!
70
posted on
10/16/2016 8:10:21 AM PDT
by
politicianslie
(What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing)
To: TimeofReason
what I really, really want is a Constitutional answer. As far as I can see, were in a desert when it comes to pickins for that.WE have to start somewhere. President Trump would listen to the masses when we have a million man march in DC.
Hussein (and Hillary will) simply went out of town and let the MSM lie about the size of the crowd. Remember?
71
posted on
10/16/2016 8:13:49 AM PDT
by
politicianslie
(What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing)
To: Edward.Fish; SkyPilot
Yes, without even clicking your link, or going any further in the thread, you can only be referring to the corker bill, which stood the Constitution on its head and gave 0 the green light to make a nuclear bomb deal with Iran, and give them a big pile of cash and other goodies at the same time because they're his good buddies.
Right?
Oh, and welcome to FR.
72
posted on
10/16/2016 8:19:44 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
(Them Rooskies done it 'cause I seen 'em!!)
To: OKSooner
Yes, without even clicking your link, or going any further in the thread, you can only be referring to the corker bill, which stood the Constitution on its head and gave 0 the green light to make a nuclear bomb deal with Iran, and give them a big pile of cash and other goodies at the same time because they're his good buddies.
Right? While the Corker amendment was a terrible violation of the Constitution, it doesn't naturally/easily fall into the Constitution's own definition of Treason.
But you are correct in that it is the bill itself that the Corker amendment was attached to, which gave aid and comfort to the enemies of the States, while affirming —to some degree— the continuation of of the status of enemy.
Oh, and welcome to FR.
Thank you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson