Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InterceptPoint
Is anyone else surprised that we have heard nothing on this topic from: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Apple ...?

That's because it isn't the apocalypse that some people want to believe.

All the US did was cede oversight of the organization that controls the root DNS servers.

What are the root DNS servers? They are effectively the global address book, mapping domain names to IP addresses.

You don't normally request information from the root DNS servers. You ask your local DNS server (normally operated by your ISP) for the IP address of freerepublic.com. If your local DNS server doesn't already know it, it asks the root DNS server, then sends it to you. Your local DNS server then keeps the address of freerepublic.com in its cache until it expires automatically.

So, let's pretend that ICANN is unduly influenced by someone in the future to remove "objectionable" websites from the root DNS server. All that means is that it is no longer in the global address list. The website doesn't disappear -- you just need to know is the IP address.

But, how do you know that IP address? The answer: use an alternate DNS server. If ICANN starts censoring the root DNS servers, you can expect alternate DNS services will pop up and provide the "missing" domain names, in addition to everything in the root DNS servers. It's very easy to modify your computer, phone, or home router to use the alternate DNS servers.

Who will operate these alternative DNS servers? There are two already in operation: Google DNS and OpenDNS. You can use them now, and their service is usually superior to the DNS servers operated by your ISP.

I've found that complaints of "my Internet isn't working" is usually caused by a slow DNS at your ISP. The classic symptom: you enter a new website address, and it says: "server not found". You wait a few seconds and try again, and it works. If you are seeing that on a regular basis, try changing your DNS server. Both Google DNS and OpenDNS provide tutorials to do so.

I'm not claiming ceding oversight of ICANN was a good idea. But, it isn't the crisis that many want you to believe. The Internet is far more resilient: it treats censorship as damage, and is easily circumvented.

18 posted on 10/05/2016 8:30:59 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

Thanks for the detailed reply. You have confirmed my gut feel in spades.


22 posted on 10/05/2016 9:01:42 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you should have endorsed. Big mistake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking
How does ceding ICANN benefit the U S?

Why do it?

25 posted on 10/05/2016 9:34:03 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking

Bump to the top..


27 posted on 10/05/2016 10:17:14 AM PDT by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking

I do not dispute what you say; you are more knowledgeable than I on this subject.

I fear this because they - the enemies of freedom - obviously want it, and because they - the enemies of freedom - always find a way to pervert every law and regulation.


31 posted on 10/05/2016 11:57:11 AM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson