Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COBOL2Java

“...if defendants can prove that they were “not motivated by sexual interest,” then they can avoid being deemed sex offenders. But this places the burden of proof on the accused to prove their innocence, not the state to prove their guilt. The state no longer has to demonstrate that the contact was non-sexual—the accused party has to prove that.”


Boom. That makes it unconstitutional.


7 posted on 10/03/2016 9:48:28 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Douglas
Boom. That makes it unconstitutional.

Now all we have to do is find a government that cares what is or isn't Constitutional.

9 posted on 10/03/2016 9:51:04 AM PDT by TigersEye (~Questionable Hillary thinks Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson