Well as your fellow Brother FReeper, if Clinton did it, the have him do a DNA test, for DNA does not lie for the most part that is, unless he has something to hide.
It's not who votes (whose DNA it is), it's who counts the votes (it's who tests the DNA).
All it takes is a small 'donation' to the testing lab.
If this is his son, he should have been providing for him and recognizing him as such.
At the very least, there should be a DNA test. For the justice of all involved.
It’s not fair for the young man to be misled - one way or the other.
He is an innocent party, but is entitled to the truth.