Not sure why Trump agreed to the same-old same-old with these debates. Once again we have Democrat-friendly moderators, effectively making it a 2-1 gang-up against the Republican.
Why couldn't somebody like Sean Hannity be a moderator? I know that Sean would be fair to the other side and would never participate in any kind of dishonesty or cheating.
Anyway, I figure Trump didn't think it would matter too much. And maybe it hasn't. Trump held his own the other night and so damage was done. But it was plainly obvious that Lester Holt was conspiring with the Crooked One to gang up against Trump and give every possible advantage to her.
-
Wow, check out the look the guy gives Lester Hoax in the second angle.
It’s Done, I got it.
.
Because instead of moderating, Hannity would just talk about himself for 90 minutes.
I can't listen to his radio program - wish that I could, it's on during my commute home - because every interview that he does, he winds up making it all about himself. Drives me up a tree. So, instead of yelling "Shut up and let the guy talk!" at the radio, I just turn it off. The radio doesn't respond when I yell at it, anyway. :-)
Sean Hannity likes himself some Sean Hannity.
I want a citizen to moderate, not a media personality.
My thoughts exactly! Trump is a deal maker. He even wrote a book about making deals. Soo, I thought, he’s going to really make the debates fair. First time in a long time.
But then the moderators are all liberals. What??...I wondered. Then all this other stuff ... Hillary’s hand signals and the cleaner. What a disappointment in Trump and even Rudy who has been in politics and is Trumps close advisor.