Posted on 09/27/2016 12:14:31 PM PDT by GilGil
Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, (R-NYC), weighed in on the first presidential debate and some of the fact-checking by moderator Lester Holt.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Giuliani was insistent that Holt had no idea what he was talking about and purposely twisted the whole SAF issue to benefit Clinton.
100%
Holt the Dolt.
“Fact checking” has become a euphemism for Democrat spin.
I thought it was also known as a Terry Stop, which was found constitutional in 1968.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968),
Holt was as biased as biased can get.
Fact checking has become a euphemism for Democrat spin.
_______________
You got it!
He wasn't even subtle about it.
Holt was as biased as biased can get.
_______________
The nice part is that everyone knows it and the majority of people identify with Trump. So if Holt is biased against Trump he is also biased against the voters and they will vote at an emotional level against Holt and for Trump.
Holt was as biased as biased can get.
Dumb as bumb can be. Predictable script follower. Journalist, my azz!
Trump should have used LAW & ORDER as a bridge theme to get to the point that Hillary is not SUBJECT TO LAWS!
In Fact the Arab Spring should have been cited as the pinnacle of an ANTI-L&W candidate in creating chaos, mayhem, bloodlust, rape and plunder in the ME and continuing this perverse fetish here in the USA with SOROS.
Lester Lockstep Holt.....never strayed from his DNC talking points all night.
Holt was as biased as biased can get.
____________
Is that like stupid is as stupid does?
Yes and no. The district court judge ruled that it was, but district courts are not the final word on whether something is constitutional or not. The city appealed and requested a new judge, which was granted. But when de Blasio was elected the city dropped its appeal so the case never went any further.
According to Giuliani it’s constitutional!
I see an all expense paid trip to Bill's favorite island in his future.
According to others it isn't. So I guess the best thing would be for Trump to implement it and let it play out in court, though since it's a local law enforcement matter and not a federal matter I'm not sure how he would do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.