Replies

I am bothered by the distractions of any of these women going to the debate, taking up media coverage this weekend. Unless this is a feint to throw off Clinton, I see no upside as no one is going to change their vote for/against Clinton by the presence of these women. Anyone that remotely knows about or cares about these women have long since made up their mind on the Clintons.

“I see no upside as no one is going to change their vote for/against Clinton”........

No doubt you are correct that no one will change their vote. The purpose for having these women in attendance is to throw Hitlary off her intended course, cause distractions, etc. The media would be paying more attention to the audience “plants” than to Hitlary or Trump. If nothing else, it would be entertaining to see Hitlary squirm in her chair, crap her depends even have a seizure. I’d welcome seeing that as I despise the Clintons almost as much as I despise the odumbos.

Word is, Bill Clinton’s ENABLER intends on attacking Trump’s “mistreatment” of women while she has millions of Americans captive.

Trump fights Hellary’s fire with a blow torch. She started it, Trump will finish it. As always.

I think they should be there. You wouldn’t believe the number of people I meet who have never heard of Bubba’s antics. The Benghazi families and survivors also need to be there. These debates are theater not academic intellectual contests. To most voters arguing about and/or attacking and defending policy is akin to Renaissance theological debates on how many angels dance on the head of a pin. Even if the media discuss how deplorable (There’s that word again!) it is that Trump has them there. It at least will be discussed and out there for people to then make up there own minds.

I am bothered by the distractions of any of these women going to the debate, taking up media coverage this weekend. Unless this is a feint to throw off Clinton, I see no upside as no one is going to change their vote for/against Clinton by the presence of these women. Anyone that remotely knows about or cares about these women have long since made up their mind on the Clintons.

I could not disagree more. The more coverage of these women, the better. You and I know who these women are but there are many, many people who don't, especially "low-information" voters who don't live and breathe politics. Their stories are from many years ago - before Bill Clinton was President - and the media certainly hasn't been giving them attention. Do you think Juanita's story has been given much coverage? Give me a break. They try to pretend she doesn't exist.

Now, when Trump tweets about these women, the media has to cover it and explain who they are. The media has already made a big deal about Clinton brining Mark Cuban, so they would have to cover who Trump brings. Imagine the media doing a story on who Juanita is, and what she says Bill and Hillary did to her. A LOT of people would be like, "Wait, WHAT?!"

Trump could crush Hillary in the debate by doing nothing more than introducing Juanita to the world.