Skip to comments.
The Reuters/Ipsos estimate of turnout (EV's 243 Trump-242 Hillary)
Reuters and Ipsos ^
| 9/15/2016
| Staff
Posted on 09/24/2016 3:56:26 PM PDT by GilGil
Explore this scenario. Or create your own.
This scenario is based on our default turnout. Try it yourself. Click on overall turnout below to adjust turnout. Or click on add a group to start building your own version of how this campaign will play out.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 2016; clinton; election; trump
This is a bit dated, but you can see Hillary is collapsing. This election is over. Just a few more weeks, and we will be talking about president-elect Trump!
1
posted on
09/24/2016 3:56:26 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
They still predict Hillary will win.
That said, if that really jibed with reality, they would be calling the race over.
MSM is comnpletely in the tank for her.
2
posted on
09/24/2016 3:58:04 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: goldstategop
The race is over just like it was in the primaries early on.
For Reuters to admit this much means that the race is over on so many levels.
3
posted on
09/24/2016 4:00:22 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
The Donald only needs to keep her steady as she goes through the debates then guide her to victory.
The Hillary needs to keep from crashing against the jetty and capsizing.
4
posted on
09/24/2016 4:02:23 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
To: GilGil
Likelihood to Vote Calculation
.
Each respondent is given a rank based on a calculation of their likelihood to vote. That calculation is based on two factors: their demographic profile, such as race, sex and age, using historic demographic voting patterns released by the Census Bureau after general elections; as well as their self-reported likelihood to vote. To improve the accuracy of the calculation, Reuters/Ipsos also conducted an exercise in the spring of 2016 matching respondents with actual voter registrations and voting history. All respondents are then ranked according to our calculation of their likelihood to vote.You can throw all that out the window. There is a large crossover of democrats this year, but the big story is the numbers of people who haven't voted in a long time. Those people won't be included in the "likely voters".
5
posted on
09/24/2016 4:09:18 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
To: Jeff Chandler
That was my whole point in posting this. In just a few weeks we will be talking about president elect Trump. This race is over!
6
posted on
09/24/2016 4:12:52 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
That was my whole point in posting this.Glad I could help.
7
posted on
09/24/2016 4:14:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
To: Jeff Chandler
The pleasure is really all mine.
I’m here to make you look good!
8
posted on
09/24/2016 4:21:45 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
To: DownInFlames
Nice.
I have been seeing several calculations that puts Trump in the 320-340 ev’s range consistently.
We’ll take it.
10
posted on
09/24/2016 5:08:36 PM PDT
by
GilGil
To: GilGil
Everything from Reuters is a lie. Reuters is the most anti-Isaeli propaganda outlet outside of the Arab press. Reuters is the last gasp of old British fascists to keep alive Goebbel’s Nazi Ministry of Propaganda. Reuters is a hate site.
11
posted on
09/24/2016 5:32:43 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Trump will give us 80% of what we want, while hillary will take 100% of what we have)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson