Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaveFerris

“My guess would be Syrian stockpiles. Supposedly, Khadaffi destroyed all his (2003?). Of course, that doesn’t mean some didn’t survive.”

Hmm.... Does this mean Bush actually DIDN’T lie, as the dems endlessly say?/rhetorical question. I know he didn’t lie and that all the top dems of the day also said there were WMD in Iraq.


41 posted on 09/21/2016 3:16:16 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: mtrott

Well, FWIW, Syria had a fairly-extensive chemical capability and multiple SCUD launchers in the late 1990’s.

Which makes them a natural point to acquire any of Saddam’s stuff. Syria was (is) an Iran ally (the leaders anyways) whereas Saddam had fought a bloody 8-year war ending roughly a decade earlier.

A fertile breeding ground for Obama and Hillary to stir things up - which they did - Iraq, Libya, Syria.

And all of it puts the state of Israel in even more danger. /Captain Obvious


48 posted on 09/21/2016 3:28:28 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson