Posted on 09/19/2016 3:12:00 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Link only:
https://mobile.twitter.com/UnstrippedVoice/status/777963271471132672/video/1
Why do you keep ignoring that he was shot on the ground?
You got it. In LA he would have made two steps towards that vehicle he was headed to and it’s safe bet they would have stopped the suspect one way or another.
White broncos have bad ju-ju.
You call him “suspect”. Suspected of doing what?
___________________________________________
If he was disobeying lawful police commands, at that point he was more than a suspect, he was actually violating the law and purposely posing a threat to law officers, and potentially to innocent bystanders. Fair game.
Every officer has or should have seen this video. It makes an impression.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=969_1263249923
It is why you cannot muck around with someone headed back to the car.
“It’s a disorder, mostly found in urban areas. Its called FTP.”
Or, in the “Famous Last Words” category: “Shoot me, mother#*$@#!!!”
I simply explained to you it's imperative the suspect not be allowed to enter or reach into that vehicle, and that clearly appears is what he was attempting to do. No?
Personally, I don’t see how Hillary benefits from any of these cases, no matter the circumstances. If there’s a clear case of murder, as was the case in South Carolina, there’s really no controversy about it, it becomes a nonissue. But in the vast majority of the rest of cases, it looks like the “victim” brought it upon themselves in some way. If the election comes down to who is with the cops versus who is with the miscreants of varying degrees of culpability who end up getting shot by the cops, Hillary does not win that.
_______________________
Exactly the way I see it.
“It’s a disorder, mostly found in urban areas. Its called FTP.”
Or, in the “Famous Last Words” category: “Shoot me, mother#*$@#!!!”
___________________________________
Perfectly true in every sense of the word.
And you still refuse to acknowledge that he was shot on the pavement in your defense that he could of turned into superman.
I have no idea where the suspect was shot, how many times, or if he was tased first or at all. And where he was shot was not my argument, read back.
I simply explained to you it's imperative the suspect not be allowed to enter or reach into that vehicle, and that clearly appears is what he was attempting to do. No?
Police chief video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHl_E2DhTPI
The statement about “it’s going to blow” starts at about the 1:10 point in the video.
AND the guy could have a bomb rigged to blow by remote. If his hands come down, he’s toast.
He didn’t commit any crime. It was a cop fantasy in motion. That is what you are sticking up for. A fantasy.
___________________________
Nonsense. He violated the law when he refused to obey a lawful command of law enforcement officers, and in doing so he willfully put them, and possibly innocent bystanders, at risk of serious harm or death. The police had a duty to prevent that.
He was lying on the pavement. How could he be reaching into his vehicle? That is what the video shows. They shoot him lying on the pavement.
Since you’ve repeated this 15 times, lets say he was shot while on the ground. Did you have a good closeup view of the suspect when he was on the ground and out of the choppers camera field of view?
Remember, suspects get shot on the ground generally for damn good reason, it happens and is certainly not unheard of.
“He was lying on the pavement. How could he be reaching into his vehicle? That is what the video shows. They shoot him lying on the pavement.”
What video are you watching that you can tell?
I posted 2 gifs showing he was on the ground and never got off of it. That is why the police chief said it is a criminal investigation. He no weapons on him or in the car. You guys are scary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.